Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

AL KHATTIYA

IMO: 9431111
Type: LNG carrier
Port of registry: Majuro, Marshall Islands
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.12 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

306.3 kg/nm

LNG carrier median 190.4 kg/nm (+61%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

8.03

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 7.12 (+13%)

Average speed

14.7 kn

LNG carrier median 14.4 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

108.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,156 t

CO₂ emitted

40,944 t

41,576 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

42,947 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,917 h

122 days, 33% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 306.3 kg/nm · median 190.4 (+61%)

152.1Ranks 334 of 386, lowest first319.4

Average speedThis ship 14.7 kn · median 14.4 (+2%)

11.2Faster than 58% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 8.03 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+13%)

5.06Ranks 232 of 386, lowest first16.14

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU38%
Into the EU61%
At berth in the EU1%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (20,753 t).

Fuel burned laden

62%

38% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.6 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

AL KHATTIYA
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AL KHATTIYA
LNG carrier median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

AL KHATTIYA
LNG carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.8 kn	+7%	+13%	+123%	+18%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+2.1 kn	−24%	−10%	+116%	−40%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 24%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.0 kn	+3%	−12%	−58%	−49%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.2 kn	+11%	+21%	−45%	+99%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.5 kn	+3%	−8%	−35%	+41%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.6 kn	−9%	−5%	−18%	−33%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.2 kn	−0%	+1%	+88%	+11%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited	13,156	40,944	42,947	2,917	14.7	306.3	–	62%
2024	Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited	5,506	17,047	19,221	1,378	13.9	286.5	–	63%
2023	not published	3,379	10,528	8,918	758	11.8	378.9	–	–
2022	not published	7,690	24,009	20,991	1,521	13.8	366.3	–	53%
2021	not published	12,673	39,443	38,315	3,037	12.6	330.8	–	53%
2020	not published	18,939	59,130	59,123	4,187	14.1	320.3	–	65%
2019	not published	25,499	79,734	72,320	5,366	13.5	352.6	–	50%
2018	not published	13,609	42,490	38,561	2,892	13.3	352.9	–	52%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited	8.03	7.12	+13%	232 of 386	Lloyd's Register	B
2024	Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited	6.82	7.39	−8%	139 of 312	Lloyd's Register	B
2023	not published	11.45	9.10	+26%	253 of 355	Lloyd's Register	B
2022	not published	22.50	10.38	+117%	329 of 379	Lloyd's Register	B
2021	not published	11.31	10.46	+8%	161 of 289	Lloyd's Register	B
2020	not published	8.00	10.71	−25%	53 of 267	Lloyd's Register	B
2019	not published	11.89	10.87	+9%	149 of 248	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	10.72	10.92	−2%	92 of 197	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.