Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

AL KHATTIYA

IMO: 9431111
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro, Marshall Islands
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.12 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

320

LNG carrier median 297 kg/nm (+8%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

8.00

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.7 (−25%)

Average speed

14.1 kn

LNG carrier median 14.7 kn (−4%)

Fuel per day at sea

108.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

18,939 t

CO₂ emitted

59,130 t

Distance sailed

59,123 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,187 h

174 days, 48% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 306 kg/nm · median 190 (+61%)

152Ranks 334 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 14.7 kn · median 14.4 (+2%)

11.2Faster than 58% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 8.03 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+13%)

5.06Ranks 232 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports2%
From the EU48%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

12,310 t

65% of all fuel; 35% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

958 t

1.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AL KHATTIYA
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AL KHATTIYA
LNG carrier median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

AL KHATTIYA
LNG carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.8 kn	+7%	+13%	+123%	+18%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+2.1 kn	−24%	−10%	+116%	−40%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 24%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.0 kn	+3%	−12%	−58%	−49%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.2 kn	+11%	+21%	−45%	+99%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.5 kn	+3%	−8%	−35%	+41%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.6 kn	−9%	−5%	−18%	−33%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.2 kn	−0%	+1%	+88%	+11%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited	13,156	40,944	42,947	2,917	14.7	306	–	62%
2024Bio blend	Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited	5,506	17,047	19,221	1,378	13.9	287	–	63%
2023	not published	3,379	10,528	8,918	758	11.8	379	–	–
2022	not published	7,690	24,009	20,991	1,521	13.8	366	–	53%
2021	not published	12,673	39,443	38,315	3,037	12.6	331	–	53%
2020	not published	18,939	59,130	59,123	4,187	14.1	320	–	65%
2019	not published	25,499	79,734	72,320	5,366	13.5	353	–	50%
2018	not published	13,609	42,490	38,561	2,892	13.3	353	–	52%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited	8.03	7.12	+13%	232 of 386	Lloyd's Register	B
2024Bio blend	Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited	6.82	7.39	−8%	139 of 312	Lloyd's Register	B
2023	not published	11.5	9.10	+26%	253 of 355	Lloyd's Register	B
2022	not published	22.5	10.4	+117%	329 of 379	Lloyd's Register	B
2021	not published	11.3	10.5	+8%	161 of 289	Lloyd's Register	B
2020	not published	8.00	10.7	−25%	53 of 267	Lloyd's Register	B
2019	not published	11.9	10.9	+9%	149 of 248	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	10.7	10.9	−2%	92 of 197	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.