Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

AL BAHIYA

IMO: 9431147
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro, Marshall Islands
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.10 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

332

LNG carrier median 297 kg/nm (+12%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

11.0

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.7 (+3%)

Average speed

14.5 kn

LNG carrier median 14.7 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

115.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,428 t

CO₂ emitted

44,990 t

Distance sailed

43,476 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,006 h

125 days, 34% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 287 kg/nm · median 190 (+51%)

152Ranks 313 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 14.3 kn · median 14.4 (−1%)

11.2Faster than 46% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 8.70 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+22%)

5.06Ranks 254 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU48%
Into the EU49%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

7,113 t

49% of all fuel; 51% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,107 t

2.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AL BAHIYA
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AL BAHIYA
LNG carrier median

11.012.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

AL BAHIYA
LNG carrier median

5.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.0 kn	−15%	−21%	−67%	−14%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+4.0 kn	−10%	+21%	+28%	−21%	4.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2023	−0.9 kn	+20%	+12%	+514%	−13%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−2.3 kn	−6%	−21%	−78%	+35%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.6 kn	−13%	−2%	−34%	−16%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.4 kn	+3%	+6%	+185%	−29%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited	7,013	21,826	24,401	1,712	14.3	287	–	53%
2024	Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited	24,904	77,205	73,789	4,833	15.3	338	–	51%
2023	not published	21,773	67,881	57,864	5,121	11.3	376	–	–
2021	not published	2,944	9,115	9,424	775	12.2	312	–	53%
2020	not published	14,428	44,990	43,476	3,006	14.5	332	–	49%
2019	not published	25,077	78,282	65,909	5,118	12.9	381	–	53%
2018	not published	8,583	26,681	23,142	1,848	12.5	371	–	53%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited	8.70	7.12	+22%	254 of 386	Lloyd's Register	B
2024	Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited	10.1	7.39	+37%	222 of 312	Lloyd's Register	B
2023	not published	12.8	9.10	+41%	280 of 355	Lloyd's Register	B
2021	not published	14.8	10.5	+41%	228 of 289	Lloyd's Register	B
2020	not published	11.0	10.7	+3%	140 of 267	Lloyd's Register	B
2019	not published	13.2	10.9	+21%	170 of 248	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	18.7	10.9	+71%	178 of 197	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.