Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

MARFRET MARAJO

IMO
9431630
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
11,141 t
Flag (estimated)
France
Port of registry
Marseille
Technical efficiency
EIV 26.36 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 11,454 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
145
Container median 182 kg/nm (−20%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
39.5
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+95%)
Average speed
16.1 kn
Container median 13.8 kn (+17%)
Fuel per day at sea
56.1 t/day
Fuel consumed
10,977 t
CO₂ emitted
34,306 t
Distance sailed
75,788 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
4,697 h
196 days, 54% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2020

Set against all 1,797 container ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 139 kg/nm · median 172 (−19%)
80.4Ranks 715 of 1,797, lowest first315
Average speedThis ship 14.2 kn · median 14.0 (+1%)
10.4Faster than 54% of container ships16.6
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 39.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.6 (+122%)
7.14Ranks 1,466 of 1,797, lowest first52.3
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports16%
  • From the EU39%
  • Into the EU41%
  • At berth in the EU4%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
1,461 t
4.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • MARFRET MARAJO
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • MARFRET MARAJO
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • MARFRET MARAJO
  • Container median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2019→2020−2.0 kn−2%−14%−72%+8%2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019+0.1 kn−2%−2%+15%−8%Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2020not published3,39410,60924,3711,71014.213939.1–
2019not published12,35638,62087,1835,38216.214236.2–
2018not published10,97734,30675,7884,69716.114539.5–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2020not published39.117.6+122%1,466 of 1,797DNVA
2019not published36.218.9+92%1,361 of 1,788DNVA
2018not published39.520.2+95%1,338 of 1,705DNVA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.