Navalyze

Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

CASTILLO DE SANTISTEBAN

IMO
9433717
Type
LNG carrier
Port of registry
Valletta
Technical efficiency
EIV 9.38 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Empresa Naviera Elcano, S.A. · part of Elcano

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
–
CO₂ per transport work (volume)
–
g CO₂/m³·nm
Average speed
–
Fuel per day at sea
–
Fuel consumed
0 t
CO₂ emitted
0 t
0 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
–
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
0 h
0 days, 0% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 312 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 215.0 kg/nm · median 204.5 (+5%)
147.8Ranks 179 of 312, lowest first328.0
Average speedThis ship 16.6 kn · median 14.6 (+14%)
11.0Faster than 95% of LNG carrier ships16.1
CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 5.60 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.39 (−24%)
4.54Ranks 84 of 312, lowest first17.34
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

The voyage split is not in this year's report.

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
–
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.0 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • CASTILLO DE SANTISTEBAN
  • LNG carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • CASTILLO DE SANTISTEBAN
  • LNG carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

  • CASTILLO DE SANTISTEBAN
  • LNG carrier median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025–––––
2018→2024+1.3 kn−25%−19%+32%−46%1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025Empresa Naviera Elcano, S.A.00–0––––
2024LNGEmpresa Naviera Elcano, S.A.3,3769,07815,70094616.6215.0––
2018LNGnot published3,4189,54311,91277715.3286.9––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nmLNG carrier medianvs LNG carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025Empresa Naviera Elcano, S.A.––––Lloyd's RegisterC
2024LNGEmpresa Naviera Elcano, S.A.5.607.39−24%84 of 312Lloyd's RegisterC
2018LNGnot published10.4110.92−5%83 of 197Bureau VeritasB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.