Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Elcanoyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Elcano | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 7 |
| CO₂ emitted | 171 kt−25.8% |
| Fuel per mile | 181 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 13.0 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 3.9% |
| Ships burning LNG | 2 |
| Main segment | LNG carrier |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
LNG carrier
CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 7.1
- Elcano7.9 (+10% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elcano | 4 | 7.9 | +10% | 216 | 14.6 | 7,600 | 1.5% | 2 |
| Segment median | 7.1 | 0% |
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0
- Elcano42.1 (+430% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elcano | 2 | 42.1 | +430% | 86 | 10.0 | 4,096 | 20.8% | – |
| Segment median | 8.0 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elcano | Lloyd's Register (7) | 14% | 14% | 71% | 0% |
Elcano: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CASTILLO DE PAMBRE | 9661857 | Oil tanker | 60.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 27.1 | +124% | 9.5 | 8,394 t | €398k |
| CASTILLO DE MERIDALNG | 9742807 | LNG carrier | 8.3 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +16% | 14.7 | 72,588 t | €1.9m |
| CASTILLO DE CALDELASLNG | 9742819 | LNG carrier | 7.5 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +5% | 14.4 | 64,809 t | €1.7m |
| CASTILLO DE ARTEAGA | 9871012 | Oil tanker | 23.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 27.1 | −13% | 10.6 | 13,617 t | €620k |
30 of 7 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.