Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM AMBARLI

IMO: 9436422
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 19,744 t
Port of registry: Valetta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.30 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: CARTAGENA TRADER

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM SA · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 19,744 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

166.5 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−6%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

26.49

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+63%)

Average speed

7.0 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−47%)

Fuel per day at sea

28.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,385 t

CO₂ emitted

20,058 t

20,372 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

38,350 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,466 h

228 days, 62% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 166.5 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−6%)

78.8Ranks 1,040 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 7.0 kn · median 13.3 (−47%)

9.1Faster than 3% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 26.49 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+63%)

7.22Ranks 1,601 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports31%
From the EU35%
Into the EU28%
At berth in the EU7%

69% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (13,741 t).

Fuel burned laden

85%

15% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

6.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.3 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CMA CGM AMBARLI
Container median

140.0160.0180.0200.0220.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM AMBARLI
Container median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM AMBARLI
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−3.5 kn	+8%	−28%	+4%	+11%	3.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−3.4 kn	+0%	−24%	+8%	+10%	3.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.0 kn	−13%	−19%	−32%	−8%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+1.5 kn	−14%	−4%	−1%	−4%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.5 kn	+22%	+26%	+42%	+8%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.9 kn	−6%	−12%	+16%	−8%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.9 kn	+17%	+25%	+112%	−39%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 17%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	CMA CGM SA	6,385	20,058	38,350	5,466	7.0	166.5	26.49	85%
2024	CMA CGM SA	5,674	17,729	36,746	3,500	10.5	154.4	23.86	89%
2023	not published	5,245	16,450	34,056	2,444	13.9	154.0	21.70	–
2022	not published	8,817	27,531	49,737	3,341	14.9	177.3	23.61	–
2021	not published	10,330	32,238	50,342	3,760	13.4	205.2	24.56	–
2020	not published	5,968	18,623	35,370	2,738	12.9	168.7	22.67	–
2019	not published	5,455	17,039	30,475	2,216	13.8	179.0	24.76	–
2018	not published	2,194	6,848	14,363	1,111	12.9	152.7	40.88	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA CGM SA	26.49	16.30	+63%	1,601 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA CGM SA	23.86	17.52	+36%	1,283 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	21.70	19.40	+12%	1,069 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	23.61	19.13	+23%	1,102 of 1,825	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	24.56	17.90	+37%	1,167 of 1,781	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	22.67	17.58	+29%	1,134 of 1,797	ABS	B
2019	not published	24.76	18.88	+31%	1,114 of 1,788	ABS	B
2018	not published	40.88	20.22	+102%	1,364 of 1,705	ABS	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.