Navalyze · Container · Ship

DUBAI EXPRESS

IMO: 9440825
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 21,311 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.76 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: HOBBY HUNTER

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HL Crewmanagement GmbH

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 26,407 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

144

Container median 172 kg/nm (−16%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

17.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−3%)

Average speed

12.3 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (−12%)

Fuel per day at sea

42.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,000 t

CO₂ emitted

21,925 t

Distance sailed

48,641 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,955 h

165 days, 45% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 142 kg/nm · median 177 (−20%)

78.8Ranks 866 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.5 kn · median 13.3 (−6%)

9.1Faster than 38% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 20.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+27%)

7.22Ranks 1,373 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports71%
From the EU17%
Into the EU8%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

895 t

4.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

DUBAI EXPRESS
Container median

100.0120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

DUBAI EXPRESS
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

DUBAI EXPRESS
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−4.7 kn	−5%	−31%	+1,630%	+7%	4.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2024	+4.3 kn	+13%	+51%	−62%	+60%	4.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+1.3 kn	+10%	+22%	−63%	−6%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.7 kn	−17%	−22%	−40%	−24%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.0 kn	−4%	−11%	−37%	−4%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	+8%	+8%	−5%	−8%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	HL Crewmanagement GmbH	9,815	30,609	69,251	5,525	12.5	142	20.7	–
2024	HL Crewmanagement GmbH	596	1,857	4,003	233	17.2	149	19.5	–
2022	not published	1,395	4,355	10,626	824	12.9	131	12.2	–
2021	not published	3,477	10,852	29,090	2,511	11.6	120	13.0	–
2020	not published	7,000	21,925	48,641	3,955	12.3	144	17.1	–
2019	not published	11,623	36,450	77,596	5,844	13.3	150	17.8	–
2018	not published	11,275	35,338	81,298	6,124	13.3	139	19.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	HL Crewmanagement GmbH	20.7	16.3	+27%	1,373 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	HL Crewmanagement GmbH	19.5	17.5	+11%	1,103 of 1,974	DNV	B
2022	not published	12.2	19.1	−36%	493 of 1,825	EnvService	B+C
2021	not published	13.0	17.9	−28%	547 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	17.1	17.6	−3%	859 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	17.8	18.9	−6%	833 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	19.3	20.2	−5%	798 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.