Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

BULK PRIDE

IMO: 9440916
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 43,848 t
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.08 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SEAMAR MANAGEMENT S.A.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 43,848 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

81.2 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (−2%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

5.86

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (−26%)

Average speed

8.8 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−18%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

842 t

CO₂ emitted

2,665 t

2,707 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

10,373 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,177 h

49 days, 13% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 81.2 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−2%)

61.0Ranks 1,697 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 8.8 kn · median 10.7 (−18%)

8.8Faster than 10% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 5.86 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (−26%)

4.80Ranks 798 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU34%
Into the EU58%
At berth in the EU6%

54% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,448 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.7%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

BULK PRIDE
Bulk carrier median

75.080.085.090.095.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

BULK PRIDE
Bulk carrier median

8.09.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BULK PRIDE
Bulk carrier median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2025	−3.6 kn	−6%	−33%	+51%	−28%	3.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.2 kn	+7%	+17%	−50%	+33%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+1.1 kn	−15%	−5%	+20%	−31%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	+5%	+6%	−46%	−14%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	+15%	+18%	+41%	+75%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.2 kn	−14%	−13%	+4%	−23%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	SEAMAR MANAGEMENT S.A.	842	2,665	10,373	1,177	8.8	81.2	5.86	–
2023	not published	595	1,856	6,867	554	12.4	86.7	8.15	–
2022	not published	1,108	3,450	13,611	1,211	11.2	81.4	6.14	–
2021	not published	1,084	3,434	11,358	1,126	10.1	95.4	8.92	–
2020	not published	1,916	6,063	21,090	2,108	10.0	90.8	10.43	–
2019	not published	1,177	3,699	14,957	1,524	9.8	78.7	5.96	–
2018	not published	1,325	4,158	14,391	1,493	9.6	92.0	7.77	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	SEAMAR MANAGEMENT S.A.	5.86	7.89	−26%	798 of 3,610	DNV	A+C
2023	not published	8.15	8.27	−1%	1,721 of 3,548	DNV	A
2022	not published	6.14	8.71	−30%	766 of 3,968	DNV	A
2021	not published	8.92	8.57	+4%	1,882 of 3,466	DNV	A
2020	not published	10.43	8.24	+27%	2,259 of 3,150	DNV	A
2019	not published	5.96	8.38	−29%	662 of 3,360	DNV	A
2018	not published	7.77	8.50	−9%	1,394 of 3,384	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.