Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

ABEL MATUTES

IMO: 9441130
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Spain
Port of registry: Santa Cruz De Tenerife
Technical efficiency: EEXI 24.57 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

156

Ro-pax median 157 kg/nm (−1%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

577

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 626 (−8%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

318

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (+26%)

Average speed

16.7 kn

Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (+4%)

Fuel per day at sea

62.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,453 t

CO₂ emitted

38,755 t

Distance sailed

79,955 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,777 h

199 days, 55% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 146 kg/nm · median 150 (−3%)

69.3Ranks 185 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 17.2 kn · median 15.8 (+9%)

12.0Faster than 64% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 217 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−62%)

66.8Ranks 124 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 194 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−23%)

48.6Ranks 172 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports96%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,674 t

4.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ABEL MATUTES
Ro-pax median

140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ABEL MATUTES
Ro-pax median

14.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

ABEL MATUTES
Ro-pax median

0.02,0004,0006,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

ABEL MATUTES
Ro-pax median

0.02,0004,0006,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	+4%	+6%	−16%	−60%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	−3%	−2%	−4%	+39%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	−7%	−7%	+26%	−33%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+2.1 kn	+6%	+22%	−10%	+120%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.9 kn	+3%	−10%	+13%	−26%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−1.4 kn	−26%	−32%	+38%	−93%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.2 kn	+21%	+7%	−40%	+101%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	11,845	34,479	81,227	4,716	17.2	146	–	–
2024LNG	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	13,557	38,391	96,710	5,732	16.9	140	–	–
2023	not published	14,622	45,290	100,858	6,042	16.7	145	–	–
2022	not published	12,453	38,755	79,955	4,777	16.7	156	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	13,073	38,170	88,816	6,091	14.6	147	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	11,260	32,408	78,410	4,740	16.5	144	–	–
2019	not published	11,053	34,468	56,915	3,178	17.9	194	–	–
2018	not published	15,396	47,965	95,648	4,754	20.1	161	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	217	567	−62%	124 of 408	194	253	−23%	RINA	A+B
2024LNG	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	536	547	−2%	200 of 404	11.6	233	−95%	RINA	A+B
2023	not published	386	680	−43%	127 of 386	229	234	−2%	RINA	–
2022	not published	577	626	−8%	189 of 394	318	253	+26%	RINA	B
2021LNG / alt.	not published	262	815	−68%	109 of 377	183	226	−19%	RINA	B
2020LNG / alt.	not published	352	751	−53%	125 of 387	196	217	−10%	RINA	B
2019	not published	4,754	569	+735%	381 of 394	4,754	223	+2,036%	RINA	B
2018	not published	2,362	729	+224%	313 of 361	2,358	184	+1,181%	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.