Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

BAHAMA MAMA

IMO: 9441142
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limasol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 34.07 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

123

Ro-pax median 153 kg/nm (−19%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

954

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 680 (+40%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

321

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 234 (+37%)

Average speed

16.7 kn

Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (+4%)

Fuel per day at sea

49.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,981 t

CO₂ emitted

30,131 t

Distance sailed

80,921 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,835 h

201 days, 55% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 133 kg/nm · median 150 (−11%)

69.3Ranks 148 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 17.3 kn · median 15.8 (+9%)

12.0Faster than 65% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 267 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−53%)

66.8Ranks 135 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 362 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+43%)

48.6Ranks 234 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports75%
From the EU10%
Into the EU10%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,428 t

4.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BAHAMA MAMA
Ro-pax median

120.0140.0160.0180.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BAHAMA MAMA
Ro-pax median

12.014.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

BAHAMA MAMA
Ro-pax median

0.02,0004,0006,0008,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

BAHAMA MAMA
Ro-pax median

0.02,0004,0006,0008,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+2.0 kn	+8%	+22%	+12%	−75%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.4 kn	+0%	−8%	−10%	+11%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.9 kn	−18%	−7%	+20%	−36%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.9 kn	+12%	−1%	−20%	+16%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+3.0 kn	−7%	+13%	+104%	+12%	3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−3.0 kn	−16%	−31%	−40%	−69%	3.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−4.4 kn	+9%	−14%	−25%	−41%	4.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	10,878	32,166	81,662	4,727	17.3	133	–	–
2024	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	8,976	26,495	72,760	4,754	15.3	123	–	–
2023	not published	9,981	30,131	80,921	4,835	16.7	123	–	–
2022	not published	10,171	31,686	67,650	4,581	14.8	150	–	–
2021	not published	11,315	33,450	84,377	5,046	16.7	134	–	–
2020	not published	5,999	17,707	41,446	3,023	13.7	145	–	–
2019	not published	11,876	37,072	68,929	4,136	16.7	172	–	–
2018	not published	14,534	45,299	91,851	4,362	21.1	158	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	267	567	−53%	135 of 408	362	253	+43%	RINA	A+B+C
2024	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	1,061	547	+94%	304 of 404	70.5	233	−70%	RINA	A+B+C
2023	not published	954	680	+40%	253 of 386	321	234	+37%	RINA	–
2022	not published	1,483	626	+137%	349 of 394	807	253	+219%	RINA	B
2021	not published	1,275	815	+56%	285 of 377	501	226	+122%	RINA	B
2020	not published	1,142	751	+52%	241 of 387	716	217	+229%	RINA	B
2019	not published	3,696	569	+550%	378 of 394	3,696	223	+1,561%	RINA	B
2018	not published	6,235	729	+755%	351 of 361	6,234	184	+3,287%	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.