Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

BALTIC QUEEN

IMO: 9443255
Type: Ro-pax ship
Port of registry: Tallinn
Technical efficiency: EIV 2.55 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HT Shipmanagement OU

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

151.8 kg/nm

Ro-pax median 150.2 kg/nm (+1%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

307

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (−46%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

62.42

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (−75%)

Average speed

14.8 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−6%)

Fuel per day at sea

54.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,762 t

CO₂ emitted

44,123 t

44,798 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

90,634 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,118 h

255 days, 70% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 151.8 kg/nm · median 150.2 (+1%)

69.3Ranks 211 of 408, lowest first232.4

Average speedThis ship 14.8 kn · median 15.8 (−6%)

12.0Faster than 35% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 306.78 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 566.51 (−46%)

66.76Ranks 147 of 408, lowest first1,568.87

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 62.42 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253.18 (−75%)

48.59Ranks 50 of 408, lowest first1,247.19

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports96%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU4%

100% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (44,123 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.7 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

BALTIC QUEEN
Ro-pax median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BALTIC QUEEN
Ro-pax median

14.014.515.015.516.016.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

BALTIC QUEEN
Ro-pax median

0.0100200300

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

BALTIC QUEEN
Ro-pax median

2004006008001,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	−2%	−2%	−0%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	−11%	−8%	+3%	+3%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	−6%	−11%	+9%	−8%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	−11%	−12%	+83%	−19%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	−20%	−18%	+28%	−18%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.1 kn	+37%	+36%	−57%	+64%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 37%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.1 kn	+1%	+2%	−11%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	HT Shipmanagement OU	13,762	44,123	90,634	6,118	14.8	151.8	–	–
2024	HT Shipmanagement OU	14,117	44,509	90,766	6,127	14.8	155.5	–	–
2023	not published	15,332	49,128	87,862	6,155	14.3	174.5	–	–
2022	not published	15,065	47,470	80,859	5,382	15.0	186.3	–	–
2021	not published	9,187	28,949	44,095	2,877	15.3	208.3	–	–
2020	not published	9,009	28,387	34,572	2,316	14.9	260.6	–	–
2019	not published	15,486	48,804	81,182	5,411	15.0	190.8	–	–
2018	not published	17,211	54,233	91,199	6,114	14.9	188.7	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	HT Shipmanagement OU	306.78	566.51	−46%	147 of 408	62.42	253.18	−75%	Verifavia	C
2024	HT Shipmanagement OU	322.22	546.68	−41%	147 of 404	92.31	232.85	−60%	Verifavia	C
2023	not published	311.80	680.04	−54%	113 of 386	81.49	233.94	−65%	Verifavia	C
2022	not published	340.60	626.32	−46%	136 of 394	50.33	252.90	−80%	Verifavia	B+C
2021	not published	422.89	815.19	−48%	141 of 377	53.72	226.00	−76%	Verifavia	B+C
2020	not published	516.74	750.91	−31%	156 of 387	90.42	217.49	−58%	Verifavia	B+C
2019	not published	315.96	569.03	−44%	130 of 394	53.28	222.56	−76%	Verifavia	B+C
2018	not published	326.90	728.92	−55%	120 of 361	50.96	184.05	−72%	Verifavia	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.