Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

BALTIC QUEEN

IMO: 9443255
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Estonia
Port of registry: Tallinn
Technical efficiency: EIV 2.55 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HT Shipmanagement OU

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

186

Ro-pax median 157 kg/nm (+19%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

341

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 626 (−46%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

50.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (−80%)

Average speed

15.0 kn

Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (−6%)

Fuel per day at sea

67.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,065 t

CO₂ emitted

47,470 t

Distance sailed

80,859 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,382 h

224 days, 61% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 152 kg/nm · median 150 (+1%)

69.3Ranks 211 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 14.8 kn · median 15.8 (−6%)

12.0Faster than 35% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 307 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−46%)

66.8Ranks 147 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 62.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−75%)

48.6Ranks 50 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports91%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4,344 t

9.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BALTIC QUEEN
Ro-pax median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BALTIC QUEEN
Ro-pax median

14.014.515.015.516.016.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

BALTIC QUEEN
Ro-pax median

0.0100200300

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

BALTIC QUEEN
Ro-pax median

2004006008001,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	−2%	−2%	−0%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	−11%	−8%	+3%	+3%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	−6%	−11%	+9%	−8%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	−11%	−12%	+83%	−19%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	−20%	−18%	+28%	−18%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.1 kn	+37%	+36%	−57%	+64%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 37%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.1 kn	+1%	+2%	−11%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	HT Shipmanagement OU	13,762	44,123	90,634	6,118	14.8	152	–	–
2024	HT Shipmanagement OU	14,117	44,509	90,766	6,127	14.8	156	–	–
2023	not published	15,332	49,128	87,862	6,155	14.3	175	–	–
2022	not published	15,065	47,470	80,859	5,382	15.0	186	–	–
2021	not published	9,187	28,949	44,095	2,877	15.3	208	–	–
2020	not published	9,009	28,387	34,572	2,316	14.9	261	–	–
2019	not published	15,486	48,804	81,182	5,411	15.0	191	–	–
2018	not published	17,211	54,233	91,199	6,114	14.9	189	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	HT Shipmanagement OU	307	567	−46%	147 of 408	62.4	253	−75%	Verifavia	C
2024	HT Shipmanagement OU	322	547	−41%	147 of 404	92.3	233	−60%	Verifavia	C
2023	not published	312	680	−54%	113 of 386	81.5	234	−65%	Verifavia	C
2022	not published	341	626	−46%	136 of 394	50.3	253	−80%	Verifavia	B+C
2021	not published	423	815	−48%	141 of 377	53.7	226	−76%	Verifavia	B+C
2020	not published	517	751	−31%	156 of 387	90.4	217	−58%	Verifavia	B+C
2019	not published	316	569	−44%	130 of 394	53.3	223	−76%	Verifavia	B+C
2018	not published	327	729	−55%	120 of 361	51.0	184	−72%	Verifavia	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.