Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

GLOVIS SOLOMON

IMO: 9445409
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 10,426 t
Flag (estimated): South Korea
Port of registry: Jeju
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.60 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Oil blended with biofuel or another alternative fuel

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: G-Marine Service Co Ltd

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

178

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

–

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

13.8 kn

Fuel per day at sea

58.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

666 t

CO₂ emitted

2,093 t

Distance sailed

3,750 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

272 h

11 days, 3% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 159 kg/nm · median 99.9 (+59%)

79.6Ranks 503 of 506, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 13.5 kn · median 14.4 (−6%)

12.0Faster than 30% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 46.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.4 (−16%)

34.7Ranks 173 of 506, lowest first158

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports18%
From the EU13%
Into the EU61%
At berth in the EU8%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

159 t

7.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

GLOVIS SOLOMON
Vehicle carrier median

80.0100.0120.0140.0160.0180.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GLOVIS SOLOMON
Vehicle carrier median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

GLOVIS SOLOMON
Vehicle carrier median

25.050.075.0100125150

’182018’192019’202020’212021’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.6 kn	+20%	+7%	−59%	+2%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.3 kn	−25%	−19%	+620%	–	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2023	+0.1 kn	+16%	+17%	−71%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.2 kn	+7%	−2%	−36%	+127%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.0 kn	−6%	+10%	−3%	−18%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.3 kn	+3%	−13%	+25%	−0%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025Bio blend	G-Marine Service Co Ltd	1,766	5,408	11,136	824	13.5	159	46.6	–
2024	HYUNDAI GLOVIS CO LTD	3,576	11,145	27,004	1,790	15.1	132	45.5	–
2023	not published	666	2,093	3,750	272	13.8	178	–	–
2021	not published	1,970	6,181	12,906	942	13.7	153	130	–
2020	not published	2,847	9,003	20,023	1,340	14.9	142	57.3	–
2019	not published	3,112	9,729	20,651	1,607	12.9	151	69.8	–
2018	not published	2,430	7,577	16,553	1,087	15.2	147	69.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025Bio blend	G-Marine Service Co Ltd	46.6	55.4	−16%	173 of 506	Korean Register	C
2024	HYUNDAI GLOVIS CO LTD	45.5	55.3	−18%	98 of 335	Korean Register	C
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	Korean Register	C
2021	not published	130	59.6	+119%	420 of 459	Korean Register	C
2020	not published	57.3	57.3	+0%	226 of 449	Korean Register	C
2019	not published	69.8	59.0	+18%	288 of 426	Korean Register	C
2018	not published	69.8	62.4	+12%	272 of 434	Korean Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.