Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

MORNING LADY

IMO: 9445980
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 7,787 t
Port of registry: Jeju
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.00 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Eukor Car Carriers Inc.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,787 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

139.0 kg/nm

Vehicle carrier median 99.9 kg/nm (+39%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

55.21

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 55.36 (−0%)

Average speed

12.4 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.4 kn (−14%)

Fuel per day at sea

41.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

240 t

CO₂ emitted

743 t

754 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

1,727 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

140 h

6 days, 2% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 139.0 kg/nm · median 99.9 (+39%)

79.6Ranks 497 of 506, lowest first119.0

Average speedThis ship 12.4 kn · median 14.4 (−14%)

12.0Faster than 13% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 55.21 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.36 (−0%)

34.70Ranks 250 of 506, lowest first158.48

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports51%
From the EU9%
Into the EU12%
At berth in the EU29%

81% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (605 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

28.7%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MORNING LADY
Vehicle carrier median

90.0100.0110.0120.0130.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MORNING LADY
Vehicle carrier median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MORNING LADY
Vehicle carrier median

20.040.060.080.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−3.4 kn	+10%	−14%	−93%	+47%	3.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+4.7 kn	−3%	+38%	−14%	−23%	4.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.8 kn	−3%	−22%	−28%	+22%	2.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	−4%	−7%	+72%	−28%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	+3%	+6%	−4%	+7%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	+20%	+21%	−29%	+33%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−1.8 kn	+6%	−6%	−12%	−2%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Eukor Car Carriers Inc.	240	743	1,727	140	12.4	139.0	55.21	–
2024	Eukor Car Carriers Inc.	3,150	9,816	24,907	1,576	15.8	126.5	37.61	–
2023	not published	3,755	11,711	28,804	2,593	11.1	130.4	48.65	–
2022	not published	5,347	16,687	39,967	2,872	13.9	133.8	39.90	–
2021	not published	3,246	10,130	23,296	1,624	14.3	139.3	55.21	–
2020	not published	3,301	10,343	24,371	1,745	14.0	135.5	51.61	–
2019	not published	3,870	12,123	34,397	2,476	13.9	112.5	38.78	–
2018	not published	4,146	12,912	38,903	2,479	15.7	106.6	39.42	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Eukor Car Carriers Inc.	55.21	55.36	−0%	250 of 506	DNV	C
2024	Eukor Car Carriers Inc.	37.61	55.31	−32%	32 of 335	DNV	C
2023	not published	48.65	56.64	−14%	136 of 417	DNV	C
2022	not published	39.90	57.66	−31%	44 of 463	DNV	C
2021	not published	55.21	59.57	−7%	191 of 459	DNV	C
2020	not published	51.61	57.26	−10%	165 of 449	DNV	C
2019	not published	38.78	90.89	−57%	7 of 271	DNV	C
2018	not published	39.42	91.03	−57%	10 of 260	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.