Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

MORNING LADY

IMO: 9445980
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 7,787 t
Flag (estimated): South Korea
Port of registry: Jeju
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.00 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Oil blended with biofuel or another alternative fuel

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Eukor Car Carriers Inc.

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,357 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

130

Vehicle carrier median 103 kg/nm (+27%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

48.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 56.6 (−14%)

Average speed

11.1 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.5 kn (−23%)

Fuel per day at sea

34.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,755 t

CO₂ emitted

11,711 t

Distance sailed

28,804 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,593 h

108 days, 30% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 139 kg/nm · median 99.9 (+39%)

79.6Ranks 497 of 506, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 12.4 kn · median 14.4 (−14%)

12.0Faster than 13% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 55.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.4 (−0%)

34.7Ranks 250 of 506, lowest first158

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports15%
From the EU58%
Into the EU20%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

868 t

7.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MORNING LADY
Vehicle carrier median

90.0100.0110.0120.0130.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MORNING LADY
Vehicle carrier median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MORNING LADY
Vehicle carrier median

20.040.060.080.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−3.4 kn	+10%	−14%	−93%	+47%	3.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+4.7 kn	−3%	+38%	−14%	−23%	4.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.8 kn	−3%	−22%	−28%	+22%	2.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	−4%	−7%	+72%	−28%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	+3%	+6%	−4%	+7%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	+20%	+21%	−29%	+33%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−1.8 kn	+6%	−6%	−12%	−2%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025Bio blend	Eukor Car Carriers Inc.	240	743	1,727	140	12.4	139	55.2	–
2024	Eukor Car Carriers Inc.	3,150	9,816	24,907	1,576	15.8	127	37.6	–
2023	not published	3,755	11,711	28,804	2,593	11.1	130	48.7	–
2022	not published	5,347	16,687	39,967	2,872	13.9	134	39.9	–
2021	not published	3,246	10,130	23,296	1,624	14.3	139	55.2	–
2020	not published	3,301	10,343	24,371	1,745	14.0	136	51.6	–
2019	not published	3,870	12,123	34,397	2,476	13.9	113	38.8	–
2018	not published	4,146	12,912	38,903	2,479	15.7	107	39.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025Bio blend	Eukor Car Carriers Inc.	55.2	55.4	−0%	250 of 506	DNV	C
2024	Eukor Car Carriers Inc.	37.6	55.3	−32%	32 of 335	DNV	C
2023	not published	48.7	56.6	−14%	136 of 417	DNV	C
2022	not published	39.9	57.7	−31%	44 of 463	DNV	C
2021	not published	55.2	59.6	−7%	191 of 459	DNV	C
2020	not published	51.6	57.3	−10%	165 of 449	DNV	C
2019	not published	38.8	90.9	−57%	7 of 271	DNV	C
2018	not published	39.4	91.0	−57%	10 of 260	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.