Navalyze · Container · Ship

COSCO PHILIPPINES

IMO: 9448762
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 59,296 t
Flag (estimated): Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EIV 15.56 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 59,634 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

259

Container median 172 kg/nm (+50%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

13.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−22%)

Average speed

14.7 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+5%)

Fuel per day at sea

91.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

20,411 t

CO₂ emitted

64,662 t

Distance sailed

78,802 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,370 h

224 days, 61% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2022

Set against all 1,825 container ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 311 kg/nm · median 178 (+75%)

77.9Ranks 1,621 of 1,825, lowest first314

Average speedThis ship 10.1 kn · median 13.6 (−26%)

10.1Faster than 10% of container ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 16.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 19.1 (−14%)

7.44Ranks 792 of 1,825, lowest first52.6

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports13%
From the EU43%
Into the EU40%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,302 t

3.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

COSCO PHILIPPINES
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022

Average speed, kn

COSCO PHILIPPINES
Container median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

COSCO PHILIPPINES
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2021→2022	−3.9 kn	+5%	−24%	−55%	+10%	3.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.7 kn	+15%	+9%	−30%	+9%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.6 kn	+1%	−3%	−7%	+0%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+4.5 kn	+12%	+59%	+247%	−16%	4.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2022	not published	7,822	24,646	25,190	2,484	10.1	311	16.5	–
2021	not published	16,450	51,888	55,459	3,969	14.0	297	15.0	–
2020	not published	20,411	64,662	78,802	5,370	14.7	259	13.8	–
2019	not published	21,664	68,011	84,330	5,502	15.3	257	13.7	–
2018	not published	5,577	17,412	24,331	2,247	10.8	229	16.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2022	not published	16.5	19.1	−14%	792 of 1,825	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	15.0	17.9	−16%	716 of 1,781	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	13.8	17.6	−22%	645 of 1,797	DNV	B+C
2019	not published	13.7	18.9	−27%	549 of 1,788	DNV	B+C
2018	not published	16.3	20.2	−19%	631 of 1,705	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.