Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

COSCO MALAYSIA

IMO
9448774
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
55,977 t
Flag (estimated)
Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry
Hong Kong
Technical efficiency
EIV 17.04 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 55,977 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
237
Container median 178 kg/nm (+33%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
13.4
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (−30%)
Average speed
14.2 kn
Container median 13.6 kn (+4%)
Fuel per day at sea
80.6 t/day
Fuel consumed
13,309 t
CO₂ emitted
42,006 t
Distance sailed
56,211 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,964 h
165 days, 45% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2022

Set against all 1,825 container ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 237 kg/nm · median 178 (+33%)
77.9Ranks 1,225 of 1,825, lowest first314
Average speedThis ship 14.2 kn · median 13.6 (+4%)
10.1Faster than 61% of container ships16.1
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 19.1 (−30%)
7.44Ranks 584 of 1,825, lowest first52.6
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports8%
  • From the EU50%
  • Into the EU40%
  • At berth in the EU2%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
844 t
2.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • COSCO MALAYSIA
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • COSCO MALAYSIA
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • COSCO MALAYSIA
  • Container median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2021→2022−2.6 kn+3%−13%+161%−7%2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2021+2.1 kn−31%−21%+1,131%−15%2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 31%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2022not published13,30942,00656,2113,96414.223713.4–
2021not published4,95415,62421,5481,28016.823014.3–
2018not published5861,8261,75112014.733516.8–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2022not published13.419.1−30%584 of 1,825DNVB+C
2021not published14.317.9−20%666 of 1,781DNVB+C
2018not published16.820.2−17%667 of 1,705DNVB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.