Navalyze · Container · Ship

C HAMBURG

IMO: 9450375
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 60,312 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.97 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: CPO HAMBURG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Danaos Shipping Co LTD · part of Danaos

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 60,312 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

280.8 kg/nm

Container median 167.2 kg/nm (+68%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

14.54

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.52 (−17%)

Average speed

14.1 kn

Container median 13.5 kn (+4%)

Fuel per day at sea

95.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,269 t

CO₂ emitted

35,195 t

35,748 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

40,134 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,839 h

118 days, 32% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,974 container ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 280.8 kg/nm · median 167.2 (+68%)

78.9Ranks 1,650 of 1,974, lowest first301.6

Average speedThis ship 14.1 kn · median 13.5 (+4%)

9.6Faster than 61% of container ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.54 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.52 (−17%)

7.33Ranks 794 of 1,974, lowest first51.62

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports61%
From the EU33%
Into the EU1%
At berth in the EU5%

41% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (14,274 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.6 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

C HAMBURG
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

C HAMBURG
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

C HAMBURG
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	+1.9 kn	+19%	+39%	−23%	+19%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.9 kn	−15%	−21%	+14%	−7%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.1 kn	−9%	−9%	+8%	−6%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.4 kn	+25%	+14%	+0%	+11%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 25%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−1.7 kn	−11%	−21%	+9%	+4%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	+71%	+63%	+2,762%	−5%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 71%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024	Danaos Shipping Co LTD	11,269	35,195	40,134	2,839	14.1	280.8	14.54	–
2023	not published	12,308	38,488	52,299	4,294	12.2	235.3	12.20	–
2022	not published	12,721	40,166	45,708	3,491	13.1	278.3	13.14	–
2021	not published	12,970	40,975	42,281	3,240	13.0	306.8	14.00	–
2020	not published	10,365	32,411	42,231	2,943	14.4	245.4	12.66	–
2019	not published	10,670	33,266	38,642	2,404	16.1	276.1	12.12	–
2018	not published	218	679	1,350	80	16.9	161.3	12.78	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	Danaos Shipping Co LTD	14.54	17.52	−17%	794 of 1,974	DNV	B
2023	not published	12.20	19.40	−37%	549 of 1,899	DNV	B
2022	not published	13.14	19.13	−31%	566 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	14.00	17.90	−22%	630 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	12.66	17.58	−28%	546 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	12.12	18.88	−36%	458 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	12.78	20.22	−37%	416 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.