Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM DALILA

IMO: 9450624
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 53,942 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.50 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Oil blended with biofuel or another alternative fuel

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM SA · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 80,033 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

223

Container median 172 kg/nm (+29%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.78

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−50%)

Average speed

13.8 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

73.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,559 t

CO₂ emitted

33,289 t

Distance sailed

47,374 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,428 h

143 days, 39% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 222 kg/nm · median 177 (+25%)

78.8Ranks 1,411 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.1 kn · median 13.3 (−17%)

9.1Faster than 23% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−22%)

7.22Ranks 835 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports15%
From the EU31%
Into the EU50%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,075 t

3.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM DALILA
Container median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM DALILA
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM DALILA
Container median

5.010.015.020.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.5 kn	−1%	−19%	−96%	−9%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.8 kn	+1%	−4%	−5%	+8%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.8 kn	−11%	−6%	+8%	−2%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.5 kn	+2%	−14%	−4%	+2%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.3 kn	+10%	+28%	+40%	+46%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025Bio blend	CMA CGM SA	648	1,996	2,925	263	11.1	222	12.7	90%
2024	CMA CGM SA	14,851	46,376	66,079	4,847	13.6	225	13.8	95%
2023	not published	15,338	47,917	69,206	4,818	14.4	222	12.9	94%
2022	not published	15,928	50,256	63,792	4,676	13.6	250	13.1	96%
2021	not published	16,193	51,037	66,141	4,096	16.1	245	12.9	94%
2020	not published	10,559	33,289	47,374	3,428	13.8	223	8.78	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025Bio blend	CMA CGM SA	12.7	16.3	−22%	835 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA CGM SA	13.8	17.5	−21%	748 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	12.9	19.4	−34%	592 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	13.1	19.1	−32%	560 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	12.9	17.9	−28%	533 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	8.78	17.6	−50%	286 of 1,797	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.