Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM TITUS

IMO: 9450636
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 73,588 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.20 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM SA · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 67,537 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

245

Container median 172 kg/nm (+42%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−35%)

Average speed

15.7 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+12%)

Fuel per day at sea

92.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,934 t

CO₂ emitted

15,546 t

Distance sailed

20,139 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,282 h

53 days, 15% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 252 kg/nm · median 177 (+43%)

78.8Ranks 1,671 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 10.6 kn · median 13.3 (−20%)

9.1Faster than 19% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−34%)

7.22Ranks 665 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports17%
From the EU47%
Into the EU34%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

347 t

2.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM TITUS
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM TITUS
Container median

10.012.014.016.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM TITUS
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−3.7 kn	−6%	−30%	−33%	+7%	3.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+3.1 kn	+2%	+31%	+152%	−17%	3.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.0 kn	−11%	−24%	+107%	−11%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.9 kn	+19%	+40%	−16%	+8%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−4.4 kn	+1%	−28%	−11%	+10%	4.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CMA CGM SA	13,267	41,592	52,577	4,949	10.6	252	10.8	91%
2024	CMA CGM SA	21,192	66,091	78,849	5,517	14.3	269	10.0	97%
2023	not published	8,200	25,656	31,257	2,795	11.2	262	12.1	91%
2022	not published	4,434	13,996	15,103	1,142	13.2	294	13.6	90%
2021	not published	4,442	14,045	18,024	1,601	11.3	246	12.6	91%
2020	not published	4,934	15,546	20,139	1,282	15.7	245	11.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA CGM SA	10.8	16.3	−34%	665 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA CGM SA	10.0	17.5	−43%	452 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	12.1	19.4	−38%	541 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	13.6	19.1	−29%	606 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	12.6	17.9	−30%	511 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	11.4	17.6	−35%	467 of 1,797	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.