Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

LAPIS LAZULI

IMO: 9450662
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 1,303 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.04 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: FOUR OTELLO

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Load Line Marine S A

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 1,303 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

176.9 kg/nm

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

436

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

5.4 kn

Fuel per day at sea

22.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

59 t

CO₂ emitted

191 t

194 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

336 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

62 h

3 days, 1% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 3,089 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 100.6 kg/nm · median 84.6 (+19%)

61.8Ranks 2,409 of 3,089, lowest first119.4

Average speedThis ship 8.0 kn · median 10.6 (−25%)

8.8Faster than 5% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.41 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.09 (+66%)

4.85Ranks 2,638 of 3,089, lowest first15.76

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports12%
From the EU67%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU21%

66% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (127 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

21.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

LAPIS LAZULI
Bulk carrier median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LAPIS LAZULI
Bulk carrier median

4.06.08.010.012.014.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

LAPIS LAZULI
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−2.6 kn	+76%	+18%	−98%	–	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 76%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−2.8 kn	+16%	−14%	+7%	+16%	2.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.4 kn	+13%	+0%	+27%	−2%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.4 kn	−8%	−5%	−44%	+5%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.8 kn	+3%	+11%	+139%	+24%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−2.1 kn	−5%	−20%	−55%	−54%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Load Line Marine S A	59	191	336	62	5.4	176.9	435.54	–
2024part-year	Premuda S.p.A.	1,368	4,312	13,992	1,657	8.4	97.8	13.41	–
2024	Load Line Marine S A	1,714	5,401	17,031	2,136	8.0	100.6	13.41	–
2023	not published	1,374	4,321	15,881	1,473	10.8	86.5	11.53	79%
2022	not published	957	2,983	12,544	1,027	12.2	76.3	11.82	70%
2021	not published	1,856	5,817	22,423	1,898	11.8	82.8	11.26	72%
2020	not published	751	2,355	9,366	850	11.0	80.2	9.10	–
2019	not published	1,772	11,409	21,024	1,609	13.1	84.3	19.99	94%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Load Line Marine S A	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	A
2024part-year	Premuda S.p.A.	–	–	–	–	RINA	–
2024	Load Line Marine S A	13.41	8.09	+66%	2,638 of 3,089	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	11.53	8.27	+39%	2,686 of 3,548	ABS	B
2022	not published	11.82	8.71	+36%	2,968 of 3,968	ABS	B
2021	not published	11.26	8.57	+31%	2,610 of 3,466	ABS	B
2020	not published	9.10	8.24	+10%	1,906 of 3,150	ABS	B
2019	not published	19.99	8.38	+139%	3,195 of 3,360	ABS	A+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.