Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

NORDIC MASA

IMO: 9451410
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 13,288 t
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.61 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: CHEMSTAR MASA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Anglo-Eastern Tanker Management (Hong Kong) Ltd. · part of Anglo-Eastern

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 13,288 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

58.1 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−27%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

13.75

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (−9%)

Average speed

12.1 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (+9%)

Fuel per day at sea

16.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

400 t

CO₂ emitted

1,256 t

1,276 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

6,874 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

566 h

24 days, 6% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 58.1 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−27%)

52.8Ranks 218 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 12.1 kn · median 11.1 (+9%)

8.8Faster than 84% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.75 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (−9%)

7.93Ranks 638 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU22%
Into the EU63%
At berth in the EU9%

58% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (728 t).

Fuel burned laden

69%

31% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

9.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

NORDIC MASA
Chemical tanker median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NORDIC MASA
Chemical tanker median

10.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NORDIC MASA
Chemical tanker median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.4 kn	−7%	−3%	−83%	−18%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	−13%	−13%	+99%	+2%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	−3%	+3%	+210%	+2%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.8 kn	+6%	−1%	−59%	−15%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	−1%	−2%	−52%	+44%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	−27%	−30%	+235%	−79%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	+29%	+26%	−41%	+195%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 29%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Anglo-Eastern Tanker Management (Hong Kong) Ltd.	400	1,256	6,874	566	12.1	58.1	13.75	69%
2024	Anglo-Eastern Tanker Management (Hong Kong) Ltd.	2,563	8,077	41,187	3,520	11.7	62.2	16.84	66%
2023	not published	1,491	4,723	20,732	1,781	11.6	71.9	16.51	82%
2022	not published	495	1,573	6,681	606	11.0	74.1	16.21	83%
2021	not published	1,153	3,643	16,472	1,400	11.8	70.0	19.11	73%
2020	not published	2,404	7,621	34,110	2,839	12.0	70.5	13.31	94%
2019	not published	986	3,084	10,185	815	12.5	96.8	62.33	29%
2018	not published	1,288	4,017	17,122	1,335	12.8	75.2	21.15	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Anglo-Eastern Tanker Management (Hong Kong) Ltd.	13.75	15.04	−9%	638 of 1,460	ABS	B+C
2024	Anglo-Eastern Tanker Management (Hong Kong) Ltd.	16.84	16.73	+1%	643 of 1,274	ABS	B+C
2023	not published	16.51	16.23	+2%	665 of 1,314	ABS	C
2022	not published	16.21	16.06	+1%	713 of 1,409	ABS	C
2021	not published	19.11	16.69	+14%	810 of 1,343	ABS	C
2020	not published	13.31	16.16	−18%	426 of 1,312	ABS	C
2019	not published	62.33	17.32	+260%	1,287 of 1,321	ABS	C
2018	not published	21.15	17.14	+23%	845 of 1,294	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.