Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

GOLD HOSHI

IMO: 9453298
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 4,460 t
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.78 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MSC CRISTIANA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,460 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

123.1 kg/nm

Vehicle carrier median 99.9 kg/nm (+23%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

88.39

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 55.36 (+60%)

Average speed

13.2 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.4 kn (−8%)

Fuel per day at sea

38.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

423 t

CO₂ emitted

1,356 t

1,377 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

3,440 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

261 h

11 days, 3% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 123.1 kg/nm · median 99.9 (+23%)

79.6Ranks 472 of 506, lowest first119.0

Average speedThis ship 13.2 kn · median 14.4 (−8%)

12.0Faster than 23% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 88.39 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.36 (+60%)

34.70Ranks 387 of 506, lowest first158.48

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU38%
Into the EU61%
At berth in the EU1%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (686 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

GOLD HOSHI
Vehicle carrier median

90.0100.0110.0120.0130.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GOLD HOSHI
Vehicle carrier median

13.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

GOLD HOSHI
Vehicle carrier median

50.0100150200250300

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.1 kn	−7%	−14%	−86%	+35%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.2 kn	+10%	+20%	−14%	−18%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.1 kn	−12%	−24%	−23%	−15%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.4 kn	+12%	+23%	−0%	−24%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	−8%	−8%	−6%	−26%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	+5%	+1%	−8%	+156%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.3 kn	−2%	+8%	−20%	−74%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	423	1,356	3,440	261	13.2	123.1	88.39	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	3,192	9,968	24,069	1,689	14.3	132.6	65.24	–
2023	not published	3,345	10,587	27,833	2,124	13.1	120.2	79.41	–
2022	not published	4,944	15,622	36,180	2,386	15.2	136.6	93.48	–
2021	not published	4,425	13,979	36,186	2,629	13.8	122.3	122.97	–
2020	not published	5,129	16,212	38,693	2,806	13.8	132.6	166.20	–
2019	not published	5,314	16,648	42,022	2,931	14.3	126.5	64.87	–
2018	not published	6,796	21,333	52,825	4,059	13.0	128.7	253.11	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	88.39	55.36	+60%	387 of 506	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	65.24	55.31	+18%	209 of 335	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	79.41	56.64	+40%	338 of 417	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	93.48	57.66	+62%	389 of 463	DNV	C
2021	not published	122.97	59.57	+106%	414 of 459	DNV	C
2020	not published	166.20	57.26	+190%	420 of 449	DNV	C
2019	not published	64.87	58.95	+10%	260 of 426	DNV	C
2018	not published	253.11	62.35	+306%	426 of 434	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.