Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM CORTE REAL

IMO: 9454400
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 114,860 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.56 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 123,899 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

433

Container median 182 kg/nm (+138%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.9

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−46%)

Average speed

17.4 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+26%)

Fuel per day at sea

180.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

24,292 t

CO₂ emitted

75,785 t

Distance sailed

56,116 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,229 h

135 days, 37% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,899 container ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 310 kg/nm · median 165 (+88%)

77.6Ranks 1,779 of 1,899, lowest first291

Average speedThis ship 17.3 kn · median 13.2 (+31%)

10.0Faster than 99% of container ships15.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.41 g CO₂/t·nm · median 19.4 (−57%)

7.34Ranks 277 of 1,899, lowest first51.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports18%
From the EU18%
Into the EU61%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,789 t

2.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM CORTE REAL
Container median

100.0200.0300.0400.0500.0

’182018’192019’202020’232023

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM CORTE REAL
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’232023

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM CORTE REAL
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2020→2023	−1.6 kn	−8%	−16%	−71%	+18%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.5 kn	+6%	+22%	−50%	+5%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.0 kn	−27%	−31%	−34%	−38%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2023	not published	1,697	5,292	5,478	316	17.3	310	8.41	99%
2020	not published	6,330	19,753	18,769	993	18.9	337	7.13	–
2019	not published	11,815	36,872	37,270	2,271	16.4	317	6.78	96%
2018	not published	24,292	75,785	56,116	3,229	17.4	433	10.9	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023	not published	8.41	19.4	−57%	277 of 1,899	ABS	C
2020	not published	7.13	17.6	−59%	180 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	6.78	18.9	−64%	100 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	10.9	20.2	−46%	317 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.