Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM LAPEROUSE

IMO
9454412
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
144,906 t
Flag (estimated)
Malta
Port of registry
Valletta
Technical efficiency
EIV 9.85 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 138,871 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
332
Container median 174 kg/nm (+90%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
7.46
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−60%)
Average speed
16.3 kn
Container median 13.7 kn (+19%)
Fuel per day at sea
129.4 t/day
Fuel consumed
19,439 t
CO₂ emitted
60,723 t
Distance sailed
58,614 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,606 h
150 days, 41% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2020

Set against all 1,797 container ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 251 kg/nm · median 172 (+46%)
80.4Ranks 1,285 of 1,797, lowest first315
Average speedThis ship 16.0 kn · median 14.0 (+14%)
10.4Faster than 82% of container ships16.6
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 5.43 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.6 (−69%)
7.14Ranks 16 of 1,797, lowest first52.3
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports30%
  • From the EU11%
  • Into the EU56%
  • At berth in the EU3%
Fuel burned laden
18,759 t
97% of all fuel; 4% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
2,119 t
3.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • CMA CGM LAPEROUSE
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • CMA CGM LAPEROUSE
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • CMA CGM LAPEROUSE
  • Container median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2019→2020−0.3 kn−24%−26%−72%−27%0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 24%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−0.9 kn+6%+1%−13%−5%0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2020not published4,05412,70116,1421,01016.02515.43–
2019not published19,43960,72358,6143,60616.33327.4697%
2018not published21,08365,83467,6013,93317.23127.83–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2020not published5.4317.6−69%16 of 1,797ABSC
2019not published7.4618.9−60%156 of 1,788ABSC
2018not published7.8320.2−61%123 of 1,705ABSC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.