Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

CHAMPION POMER

IMO: 9455739
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 36,206 t
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.84 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IB
Former names: POMER

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ASP SHIP MANAGEMENT SINGAPORE PTE LTD

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 34,969 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

118

Chemical tanker median 90.2 kg/nm (+30%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 17.1 (−38%)

Average speed

11.0 kn

Chemical tanker median 10.1 kn (+9%)

Fuel per day at sea

31.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,746 t

CO₂ emitted

11,785 t

Distance sailed

31,855 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,890 h

120 days, 33% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 124 kg/nm · median 129 (−3%)

76.1Ranks 754 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 11.0 kn · median 10.7 (+3%)

8.0Faster than 57% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+35%)

4.51Ranks 1,129 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports9%
From the EU48%
Into the EU40%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

339 t

2.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CHAMPION POMER
Oil tanker median

80.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CHAMPION POMER
Oil tanker median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CHAMPION POMER
Oil tanker median

7.510.012.515.017.520.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.7 kn	+11%	+19%	+267%	+13%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−1.4 kn	−10%	−21%	−85%	−9%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	−0%	−4%	+250%	+5%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	+8%	+6%	−50%	−44%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+4.2 kn	+2%	+55%	+121%	+15%	4.2 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2020	−2.9 kn	−4%	−29%	−72%	+46%	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	ASP SHIP MANAGEMENT SINGAPORE PTE LTD	2,340	7,333	18,859	1,721	11.0	124	10.7	–
2024	ASP SHIP MANAGEMENT SINGAPORE PTE LTD	573	1,819	5,140	501	10.3	111	9.49	–
2023	not published	4,168	13,126	33,746	2,875	11.7	124	10.4	–
2022	not published	1,193	3,750	9,630	793	12.2	124	9.92	–
2021	not published	2,231	7,020	19,355	1,573	12.3	115	17.8	–
2020	not published	992	3,098	8,773	1,083	8.1	113	15.4	–
2018	not published	3,746	11,785	31,855	2,890	11.0	118	10.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	ASP SHIP MANAGEMENT SINGAPORE PTE LTD	10.7	7.95	+35%	1,129 of 1,665	DNV	A+C
2024	ASP SHIP MANAGEMENT SINGAPORE PTE LTD	9.49	8.06	+18%	1,108 of 1,787	DNV	A
2023	not published	10.4	8.44	+23%	1,157 of 1,797	DNV	A
2022	not published	9.92	8.51	+17%	1,184 of 1,961	DNV	A
2021	not published	17.8	8.86	+101%	1,472 of 1,789	DNV	A
2020	not published	15.4	9.03	+71%	1,442 of 1,870	DNV	A
2018	not published	10.6	17.1	−38%	210 of 1,294	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.