Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

REGINA SEAWAYS

IMO
9458535
Type
Ro-pax ship
Port of registry
Klaipeda
Technical efficiency
EEXI 27.18 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: AB DFDS Seaways · part of DFDS

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
131.8 kg/nm
Ro-pax median 150.2 kg/nm (−12%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
1,425
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (+151%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
39.71
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (−84%)
Average speed
17.6 kn
Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+11%)
Fuel per day at sea
55.6 t/day
Fuel consumed
11,076 t
CO₂ emitted
34,652 t
35,195 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
84,053 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
4,779 h
199 days, 55% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 131.8 kg/nm · median 150.2 (−12%)
69.3Ranks 143 of 408, lowest first232.4
Average speedThis ship 17.6 kn · median 15.8 (+11%)
12.0Faster than 67% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 1,424.61 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 566.51 (+151%)
66.76Ranks 360 of 408, lowest first1,568.87
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 39.71 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253.18 (−84%)
48.59Ranks 28 of 408, lowest first1,247.19
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports93%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU7%

100% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (34,652 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
7.2%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.6 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.016
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • REGINA SEAWAYS
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • REGINA SEAWAYS
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • REGINA SEAWAYS
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • REGINA SEAWAYS
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025+1.5 kn+4%+13%+19%+4%1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−3.3 kn−14%−28%−16%+2%3.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023−0.9 kn−5%−9%−27%−30%0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022+0.1 kn+0%+1%−14%+99%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021+0.2 kn+4%+5%+8%+40%Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020+0.5 kn+2%+5%+0%+23%0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019+0.3 kn+2%+4%+4%−72%0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025AB DFDS Seaways11,07634,65284,0534,77917.6131.8––
2024AB DFDS Seaways9,01228,22070,7664,38516.1127.3––
2023not published12,46938,96984,7294,37119.4147.2––
2022not published18,01856,299116,6595,74820.3154.4––
2021not published20,94665,399135,7886,72020.2154.2––
2020not published18,74358,384126,1616,31220.0148.6––
2019not published18,27956,942126,0746,47019.5145.0––
2018not published17,26453,779121,4616,32919.2142.1133.39–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025AB DFDS Seaways1,424.61566.51+151%360 of 40839.71253.18−84%DNVB
2024AB DFDS Seaways1,369.69546.68+151%337 of 40443.97232.85−81%DNVB+C
2023not published1,342.62680.04+97%329 of 386140.37233.94−40%DNVB+C
2022not published1,927.98626.32+208%368 of 394142.68252.90−44%DNVB+C
2021not published970.04815.19+19%214 of 37795.29226.00−58%VerifaviaB+C
2020not published691.96750.91−8%189 of 38784.81217.49−61%VerifaviaB+C
2019not published562.70569.03−1%194 of 39485.63222.56−62%VerifaviaB+C
2018not published2,033.54728.92+179%305 of 361–––VerifaviaB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

REGINA SEAWAYS (IMO 9458535): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2025 | Navalyze