Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

SVENJA

IMO: 9458901
Type: Other ship types
Average cargo carried: 1 t
Flag (estimated): Germany
Port of registry: Hamburg
Technical efficiency: EIV 23.72 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SAL Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS “SVENJA” · part of SAL Heavy Lift

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

115

General cargo median 57.7 kg/nm (+98%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

63.9

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.0 (+156%)

Average speed

16.0 kn

General cargo median 9.7 kn (+65%)

Fuel per day at sea

43.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,819 t

CO₂ emitted

18,353 t

Distance sailed

50,801 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,185 h

133 days, 36% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 126 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+259%)

17.4Ranks 2,718 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 14.5 kn · median 9.3 (+56%)

6.9Faster than 99% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 61.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (+142%)

10.2Ranks 2,519 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports35%
From the EU34%
Into the EU25%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,046 t

5.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Other median is the middle ship of all other ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SVENJA
Other median

25.050.075.0100.0125.0150.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SVENJA
Other median

7.510.012.515.017.520.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

SVENJA
Other median

0.0200400600

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.5 kn	+10%	+0%	+63%	−32%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.6 kn	+16%	+5%	+108%	−84%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.0 kn	−14%	−9%	+46%	–	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+4.7 kn	+5%	+46%	−78%	–	4.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−3.3 kn	+0%	−22%	−13%	−35%	3.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.8 kn	−4%	−9%	−20%	+3%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+4.9 kn	−14%	+23%	−3%	−16%	4.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	SAL Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS “SVENJA”	3,144	9,878	26,190	1,775	14.8	120	–	–
2025	SAL Ship Management UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG	4,917	15,318	38,926	2,682	14.5	126	648,854	–
2024	SAL Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS “SVENJA”	2,728	8,565	23,873	1,496	16.0	114	90.3	–
2023	not published	1,128	3,559	11,465	651	17.6	98.4	576	–
2022	not published	902	2,845	7,860	473	16.6	115	331	–
2021	not published	3,900	12,468	35,514	2,986	11.9	110	–	–
2020	not published	4,468	14,105	40,724	2,685	15.2	110	–	–
2019	not published	5,819	18,353	50,801	3,185	16.0	115	–	–
2018	not published	6,975	22,362	52,389	4,712	11.1	133	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	SAL Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS “SVENJA”	–	–	–	–	EnvService	A+C
2025	SAL Ship Management UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG	61.8	25.5	+142%	2,519 of 2,723	EnvService	A+C
2024	SAL Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS “SVENJA”	90.3	51.6	+75%	122 of 189	EnvService	A
2023	not published	576	93.5	+515%	112 of 116	Swiss Climate	A
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	Swiss Climate	A
2021	not published	42.7	22.7	+88%	1,035 of 1,142	Swiss Climate	A
2020	not published	66.0	24.5	+169%	1,107 of 1,167	Swiss Climate	A
2019	not published	63.9	25.0	+156%	1,072 of 1,154	Swiss Climate	A
2018	not published	76.1	24.9	+206%	983 of 1,044	Swiss Climate	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.