Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

LONE

IMO: 9458913
Type: General cargo ship
Average cargo carried: 536 t
Flag (estimated): Antigua and Barbuda
Port of registry: St. John'S
Technical efficiency: EIV 24.62 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SAL Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS „LONE“ · part of SAL Heavy Lift

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

137

General cargo median 55.1 kg/nm (+148%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

48.7

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 24.5 (+99%)

Average speed

15.1 kn

General cargo median 10.7 kn (+41%)

Fuel per day at sea

49.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,870 t

CO₂ emitted

12,397 t

Distance sailed

28,300 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,878 h

78 days, 21% of the year

Within the other fleet, 2024

Set against all 189 other ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 123 kg/nm · median 72.5 (+69%)

42.2Ranks 162 of 189, lowest first142

Average speedThis ship 15.9 kn · median 11.1 (+43%)

8.5Faster than 94% of other ships14.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 130 g CO₂/t·nm · median 51.6 (+153%)

21.3Ranks 136 of 189, lowest first306

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Other medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports2%
From the EU57%
Into the EU34%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

832 t

6.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LONE
General cargo median

0.0100.0200.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LONE
General cargo median

0.05.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

LONE
General cargo median

0.0100200300

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−11.8 kn	+135%	−40%	−13%	–	11.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 135%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	+10%	+10%	+11%	−52%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+7.1 kn	−31%	+26%	−40%	–	7.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 31%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−6.8 kn	+72%	−3%	+84%	–	6.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 72%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	−32%	−30%	−42%	−23%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 32%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	+16%	+16%	+118%	+19%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.3 kn	−10%	−1%	−68%	−36%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	SAL Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS „LONE“	3,752	12,028	13,355	3,214	4.2	281	1,383	–
2025	SAL Ship Management UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG	5,086	16,306	17,659	4,339	4.1	288	1,721	–
2024	SAL Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS „LONE“	2,490	7,826	20,300	1,277	15.9	123	130	–
2023	not published	2,032	6,438	18,214	1,150	15.8	112	271	–
2022	not published	4,876	15,537	30,350	3,475	8.7	161	735	–
2021	not published	1,543	4,873	16,492	1,063	15.5	93.6	–	–
2020	not published	3,870	12,397	28,300	1,878	15.1	137	–	–
2019	not published	1,534	4,835	12,981	860	15.1	118	–	–
2018	not published	5,255	16,548	40,195	2,907	13.8	131	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	SAL Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS „LONE“	–	–	–	–	EnvService	A+C
2025	SAL Ship Management UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG	–	–	–	–	EnvService	A+C
2024	SAL Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS „LONE“	130	51.6	+153%	136 of 189	EnvService	C
2023	not published	271	93.5	+190%	101 of 116	Swiss Climate	A
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	Swiss Climate	A
2021	not published	37.5	22.7	+65%	986 of 1,142	Swiss Climate	A
2020	not published	48.7	24.5	+99%	1,047 of 1,167	Swiss Climate	A
2019	not published	41.0	25.0	+64%	939 of 1,154	Swiss Climate	A
2018	not published	64.0	24.9	+157%	956 of 1,044	Swiss Climate	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.