Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

GOLD KOCHAV

IMO: 9463205
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 4,699 t
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.81 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MSC IMMACOLATA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,699 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

128.1 kg/nm

Vehicle carrier median 99.9 kg/nm (+28%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

85.32

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 55.36 (+54%)

Average speed

15.3 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.4 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

47.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,028 t

CO₂ emitted

6,346 t

6,445 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

15,829 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,034 h

43 days, 12% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 128.1 kg/nm · median 99.9 (+28%)

79.6Ranks 484 of 506, lowest first119.0

Average speedThis ship 15.3 kn · median 14.4 (+6%)

12.0Faster than 75% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 85.32 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.36 (+54%)

34.70Ranks 380 of 506, lowest first158.48

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports11%
From the EU81%
Into the EU8%
At berth in the EU1%

56% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,536 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

0.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

GOLD KOCHAV
Vehicle carrier median

80.0100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GOLD KOCHAV
Vehicle carrier median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

GOLD KOCHAV
Vehicle carrier median

50.0100150200

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+1.6 kn	+26%	+41%	−14%	–	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 26%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.9 kn	−14%	−20%	−47%	–	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.6 kn	−9%	−12%	+11%	+46%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+1.5 kn	+2%	+13%	+40%	+83%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.6 kn	−12%	−16%	−44%	−42%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+1.0 kn	+20%	+30%	−40%	+50%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 20%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.7 kn	+4%	+10%	+14%	−44%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	2,028	6,346	15,829	1,034	15.3	128.1	85.32	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	1,880	5,869	18,480	1,352	13.7	101.8	1,414.55	–
2023	not published	4,097	12,940	34,618	2,372	14.6	118.3	182.40	–
2022	not published	4,033	12,749	31,151	2,051	15.2	129.4	124.93	–
2021	not published	2,818	8,910	22,247	1,626	13.7	126.7	68.33	–
2020	not published	5,749	18,187	39,835	2,779	14.3	144.3	117.88	–
2019	not published	7,915	24,795	65,896	4,968	13.3	120.1	78.71	–
2018	not published	6,644	20,820	57,756	4,600	12.6	115.0	140.15	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	85.32	55.36	+54%	380 of 506	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	–	–	–	–	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	182.40	56.64	+222%	396 of 417	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	124.93	57.66	+117%	419 of 463	DNV	C
2021	not published	68.33	59.57	+15%	290 of 459	DNV	C
2020	not published	117.88	57.26	+106%	401 of 449	DNV	C
2019	not published	78.71	58.95	+34%	319 of 426	DNV	C
2018	not published	140.15	62.35	+125%	391 of 434	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.