Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

SLOMAN DISCHARGER (SLOMAN DISCHARGER)

IMO: 9463578
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Antigua and Barbuda
Port of registry: Saint John'S
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.41 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: SLOMAN DISCHARGER

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Sloman Neptun Schiffahrts-AG

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

62.0

General cargo median 55.1 kg/nm (+13%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

29.5

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 24.5 (+20%)

Average speed

12.2 kn

General cargo median 10.7 kn (+14%)

Fuel per day at sea

18.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,622 t

CO₂ emitted

11,476 t

Distance sailed

58,398 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,798 h

200 days, 55% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 57.0 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+62%)

17.4Ranks 1,996 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 12.3 kn · median 9.3 (+32%)

6.9Faster than 92% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 24.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−5%)

10.2Ranks 1,209 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports61%
From the EU24%
Into the EU11%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

502 t

4.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SLOMAN DISCHARGER (SLOMAN DISCHARGER)
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SLOMAN DISCHARGER (SLOMAN DISCHARGER)
General cargo median

9.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

SLOMAN DISCHARGER (SLOMAN DISCHARGER)
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.9 kn	−5%	+2%	+10%	–	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	+2%	+4%	+1%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−1.4 kn	−7%	−17%	−30%	−50%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+2.0 kn	+7%	+28%	+6%	+54%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.6 kn	−6%	−18%	−23%	+23%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.2 kn	+8%	+31%	+27%	+8%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.8 kn	−0%	+8%	+149%	−4%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Sloman Neptun Schiffahrts-AG	2,123	6,664	37,243	3,024	12.3	57.0	–	–
2024	Sloman Neptun Schiffahrts-AG	2,025	6,375	33,915	2,967	11.4	59.7	–	–
2023	not published	1,962	6,139	33,630	3,003	11.2	58.3	27.9	–
2022	not published	3,011	9,485	47,933	3,801	12.6	62.8	26,637	–
2021	not published	2,635	8,307	45,011	4,231	10.6	58.5	–	–
2020	not published	3,622	11,476	58,398	4,798	12.2	62.0	–	–
2019	not published	2,651	8,335	46,040	4,602	10.0	57.6	–	–
2018	not published	1,068	3,351	18,513	2,002	9.2	57.7	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Sloman Neptun Schiffahrts-AG	24.2	25.5	−5%	1,209 of 2,723	Swiss Climate	–
2024	Sloman Neptun Schiffahrts-AG	–	–	–	–	Swiss Climate	B+C
2023	not published	27.9	93.5	−70%	14 of 116	Swiss Climate	B+C
2022	not published	55.7	21.6	+158%	970 of 1,034	Swiss Climate	A
2021	not published	36.2	22.7	+59%	970 of 1,142	Swiss Climate	A
2020	not published	29.5	24.5	+20%	787 of 1,167	Swiss Climate	A
2019	not published	27.2	25.0	+9%	659 of 1,154	Swiss Climate	A
2018	not published	28.3	24.9	+14%	624 of 1,044	Swiss Climate	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.