Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

PASSIO PER FORMENTERA

IMO: 9465239
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Spain
Port of registry: Santa Cruz De Tenerife
Technical efficiency: EEXI 59.20 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

96.7

Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (−37%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

2,331

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 815 (+186%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

1,438

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 226 (+536%)

Average speed

12.9 kn

Ro-pax median 16.2 kn (−20%)

Fuel per day at sea

29.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,426 t

CO₂ emitted

16,997 t

Distance sailed

56,086 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,349 h

181 days, 50% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 84.0 kg/nm · median 150 (−44%)

69.3Ranks 68 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 13.3 kn · median 15.8 (−16%)

12.0Faster than 20% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 1,583 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+179%)

66.8Ranks 369 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 1,589 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+528%)

48.6Ranks 376 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports89%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU11%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,946 t

11.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

PASSIO PER FORMENTERA
Ro-pax median

80.0100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PASSIO PER FORMENTERA
Ro-pax median

10.012.014.016.018.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

PASSIO PER FORMENTERA
Ro-pax median

0.01,0002,0003,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

PASSIO PER FORMENTERA
Ro-pax median

0.01,0002,0003,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.7 kn	−1%	+4%	+12%	−24%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.7 kn	−7%	−2%	−9%	−11%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.3 kn	−1%	−10%	+2%	+2%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.3 kn	−5%	−3%	−3%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	−3%	−3%	+12%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.6 kn	−8%	−4%	+7%	+50%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−5.8 kn	−0%	−32%	−14%	−41%	5.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	4,767	14,941	56,788	4,282	13.3	84.0	–	–
2024	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	4,286	13,429	50,674	4,020	12.6	84.6	–	–
2023	not published	5,076	15,905	55,849	4,679	11.9	90.9	–	–
2022	not published	4,997	15,657	54,629	4,145	13.2	91.5	–	–
2021	not published	5,426	16,997	56,086	4,349	12.9	96.7	–	–
2020	not published	4,984	15,624	50,199	3,871	13.0	99.3	–	–
2019	not published	5,062	15,901	46,764	3,772	12.4	108	–	–
2018	not published	5,895	18,508	54,412	2,993	18.2	108	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	1,583	567	+179%	369 of 408	1,589	253	+528%	RINA	A+B
2024	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	2,090	547	+282%	368 of 404	1,352	233	+480%	RINA	A+B
2023	not published	2,360	680	+247%	365 of 386	1,578	234	+574%	RINA	–
2022	not published	2,308	626	+268%	374 of 394	1,572	253	+521%	RINA	B
2021	not published	2,331	815	+186%	344 of 377	1,438	226	+536%	RINA	B
2020	not published	2,436	751	+224%	346 of 387	1,378	217	+534%	RINA	B
2019	not published	1,626	569	+186%	347 of 394	1,626	223	+631%	RINA	B
2018	not published	2,738	729	+276%	323 of 361	2,738	184	+1,388%	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.