Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC CRISTINA

IMO: 9465241
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 109,473 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.58 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 111,138 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

339

Container median 182 kg/nm (+86%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.52

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−53%)

Average speed

12.9 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

104.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

19,931 t

CO₂ emitted

62,253 t

Distance sailed

58,839 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,560 h

190 days, 52% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 309 kg/nm · median 177 (+75%)

78.8Ranks 2,023 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.2 kn · median 13.3 (+14%)

9.1Faster than 79% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.81 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−46%)

7.22Ranks 437 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports43%
From the EU37%
Into the EU16%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,334 t

3.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC CRISTINA
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC CRISTINA
Container median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC CRISTINA
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.6 kn	+2%	−2%	+80%	+21%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.5 kn	+15%	+36%	+160%	−9%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2023	−2.3 kn	−12%	−25%	−31%	−14%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.9 kn	−3%	+10%	−76%	+2%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.4 kn	−3%	−5%	−8%	−1%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+1.2 kn	−6%	+3%	−1%	−2%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	12,650	39,437	40,890	2,697	15.2	309	8.81	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	6,861	21,376	22,669	1,437	15.8	303	7.29	–
2023	not published	2,289	7,232	8,711	654	13.3	263	8.05	–
2021	not published	3,796	11,975	12,656	813	15.6	300	9.40	–
2020	not published	16,526	52,094	53,434	3,896	13.7	309	9.25	–
2019	not published	18,537	57,900	58,119	4,135	14.1	319	9.30	–
2018	not published	19,931	62,253	58,839	4,560	12.9	339	9.52	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	8.81	16.3	−46%	437 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	7.29	17.5	−58%	191 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	8.05	19.4	−59%	251 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	9.40	17.9	−47%	281 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	9.25	17.6	−47%	323 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	9.30	18.9	−51%	277 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	9.52	20.2	−53%	227 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.