Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC BENEDETTA XIII

IMO: 9465253
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 62,188 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.66 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MSC BENEDETTA, 0117 E.R. BENEDETTA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 111,307 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

307

Container median 186 kg/nm (+65%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.60

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (−52%)

Average speed

15.0 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

110.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,014 t

CO₂ emitted

46,777 t

Distance sailed

48,867 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,259 h

136 days, 37% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 272 kg/nm · median 177 (+54%)

78.8Ranks 1,815 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 10.8 kn · median 13.3 (−19%)

9.1Faster than 20% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−15%)

7.22Ranks 925 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports26%
From the EU43%
Into the EU28%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,347 t

2.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC BENEDETTA XIII
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC BENEDETTA XIII
Container median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC BENEDETTA XIII
Container median

5.010.015.020.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−3.2 kn	−8%	−29%	−54%	+36%	3.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.8 kn	+20%	+28%	−53%	+31%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−2.0 kn	−17%	−28%	+41%	−21%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.2 kn	−4%	−2%	−31%	+14%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+1.2 kn	+11%	+21%	−18%	+14%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.4 kn	−11%	−20%	+114%	−16%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	–	–	–	–	–

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	2,842	9,033	10,450	968	10.8	272	13.9	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	6,672	21,010	22,512	1,605	14.0	296	10.2	–
2023	not published	11,837	37,452	48,032	3,647	13.2	246	7.78	–
2022	not published	10,027	31,641	33,946	2,229	15.2	295	9.79	–
2021	not published	15,014	46,777	48,867	3,259	15.0	307	8.60	–
2020	not published	16,534	51,526	59,642	4,332	13.8	277	7.57	–
2019	not published	8,725	27,350	27,875	1,829	15.2	313	9.04	–
2018	not published	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	13.9	16.3	−15%	925 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	10.2	17.5	−42%	466 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	7.78	19.4	−60%	224 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	9.79	19.1	−49%	310 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	8.60	17.9	−52%	214 of 1,781	Verifavia	B
2020	not published	7.57	17.6	−57%	208 of 1,797	Verifavia	B
2019	not published	9.04	18.9	−52%	266 of 1,788	Verifavia	B
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.