Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

EUROCARGO MALTA

IMO: 9465514
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 4,774 t
Flag (estimated): Italy
Port of registry: Palermo
Technical efficiency: EIV 10.74 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A · part of Grimaldi Group

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,906 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

131

Ro-ro median 109 kg/nm (+19%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

83.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 103 (−19%)

Average speed

18.7 kn

Ro-ro median 14.4 kn (+30%)

Fuel per day at sea

58.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,225 t

CO₂ emitted

41,276 t

Distance sailed

101,220 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,410 h

225 days, 62% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 142 kg/nm · median 105 (+36%)

56.6Ranks 207 of 235, lowest first145

Average speedThis ship 15.9 kn · median 14.4 (+10%)

10.9Faster than 73% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 93.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.2 (−2%)

47.4Ranks 117 of 235, lowest first297

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports94%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,613 t

6.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EUROCARGO MALTA
Ro-ro median

100.0110.0120.0130.0140.0150.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EUROCARGO MALTA
Ro-ro median

14.016.018.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EUROCARGO MALTA
Ro-ro median

80.090.0100110

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.3 kn	−0%	−8%	−25%	+4%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.5 kn	+0%	−8%	+0%	−3%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.9 kn	+1%	+12%	+3%	+5%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.4 kn	+1%	−12%	−4%	+2%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.5 kn	+7%	+10%	−3%	+4%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.4 kn	−5%	−7%	+20%	−4%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.2 kn	+1%	+2%	−13%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	10,432	32,587	73,331	4,615	15.9	142	93.1	–
2024	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	13,956	43,557	97,628	5,666	17.2	143	89.7	–
2023	not published	13,916	43,434	97,474	5,200	18.7	143	92.7	–
2022	not published	13,393	41,801	94,596	5,621	16.8	142	88.4	–
2021	not published	13,793	43,046	98,452	5,115	19.2	140	86.7	–
2020	not published	13,225	41,276	101,220	5,410	18.7	131	83.1	–
2019	not published	11,566	36,090	84,192	4,415	19.1	137	86.4	–
2018	not published	13,203	41,197	96,993	5,131	18.9	136	90.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	93.1	95.2	−2%	117 of 235	RINA	A
2024	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	89.7	97.5	−8%	95 of 220	RINA	A
2023	not published	92.7	109	−15%	91 of 221	RINA	A
2022	not published	88.4	90.6	−2%	106 of 223	RINA	A
2021	not published	86.7	104	−16%	83 of 219	RINA	A
2020	not published	83.1	103	−19%	85 of 238	RINA	A
2019	not published	86.4	90.9	−5%	124 of 271	RINA	A
2018	not published	90.1	91.0	−1%	124 of 260	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.