Navalyze · Container · Ship

COSCO GLORY

IMO: 9466245
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 87,327 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.84 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Seaspan Ship Management Ltd.

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 88,760 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

320

Container median 178 kg/nm (+80%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (−41%)

Average speed

15.1 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (+11%)

Fuel per day at sea

116.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

20,536 t

CO₂ emitted

64,728 t

Distance sailed

64,195 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,247 h

177 days, 48% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 265 kg/nm · median 177 (+49%)

78.8Ranks 1,769 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.9 kn · median 13.3 (−3%)

9.1Faster than 44% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.44 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−42%)

7.22Ranks 512 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports18%
From the EU40%
Into the EU39%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,890 t

2.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

COSCO GLORY
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

COSCO GLORY
Container median

10.012.014.016.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

COSCO GLORY
Container median

5.010.015.020.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.6 kn	−9%	−24%	−18%	+13%	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+4.4 kn	+14%	+59%	+175%	−15%	4.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−4.0 kn	−20%	−41%	−60%	−13%	4.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.5 kn	+1%	+5%	+0%	+5%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	+13%	+10%	+80%	+16%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Seaspan Ship Management Ltd.	15,131	47,153	57,199	4,420	12.9	265	9.44	–
2024	Seaspan Ship Management Ltd.	20,332	63,329	69,741	4,492	15.5	292	8.37	–
2023	not published	6,485	20,224	25,366	2,283	11.1	256	9.84	–
2022	not published	20,536	64,728	64,195	4,247	15.1	320	11.4	–
2021	not published	20,168	63,587	63,887	4,366	14.6	316	10.9	–
2020	not published	9,903	31,230	35,497	2,365	15.0	279	9.32	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Seaspan Ship Management Ltd.	9.44	16.3	−42%	512 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	Seaspan Ship Management Ltd.	8.37	17.5	−52%	308 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	9.84	19.4	−49%	378 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	11.4	19.1	−41%	434 of 1,825	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	10.9	17.9	−39%	388 of 1,781	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	9.32	17.6	−47%	327 of 1,797	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.