Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

STENA TRANSPORTER

IMO: 9469376
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Hoek Van Holland
Technical efficiency: EEXI 21.95 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Stena Line BV · part of Stena

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

162

Ro-pax median 157 kg/nm (+3%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

1,115

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 751 (+49%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

104

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 217 (−52%)

Average speed

16.5 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+4%)

Fuel per day at sea

64.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,850 t

CO₂ emitted

33,879 t

Distance sailed

67,133 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,058 h

169 days, 46% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 145 kg/nm · median 150 (−3%)

69.3Ranks 182 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 15.8 kn · median 15.8 (+0%)

12.0Faster than 51% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 1,260 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+122%)

66.8Ranks 338 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 114 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−55%)

48.6Ranks 107 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports93%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,473 t

7.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

STENA TRANSPORTER
Ro-pax median

140.0145.0150.0155.0160.0165.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

STENA TRANSPORTER
Ro-pax median

15.516.016.517.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

STENA TRANSPORTER
Ro-pax median

50.0100150200250300

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

STENA TRANSPORTER
Ro-pax median

4006008001,0001,2001,400

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	+1%	−1%	+4%	+11%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	−0.2 kn	−4%	−5%	−5%	+1%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	+3%	+1%	+1%	+5%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	−1%	−2%	+3%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	−9%	−9%	−0%	+4%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.3 kn	+5%	+4%	−1%	+78%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.2 kn	−3%	−3%	−2%	−26%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Stena Line BV	9,969	31,104	68,692	4,347	15.8	145	–	–
2024	Stena Line BV	9,514	29,681	66,054	4,114	16.1	144	–	–
2023	not published	10,376	32,372	69,446	4,266	16.3	149	–	–
2022	not published	9,998	31,182	68,805	4,156	16.6	145	–	–
2021	not published	9,840	30,690	66,969	4,020	16.7	147	–	–
2020	not published	10,850	33,879	67,133	4,058	16.5	162	–	–
2019	not published	10,370	32,383	67,607	4,035	16.8	153	–	–
2018	not published	10,954	34,207	68,934	4,150	16.6	159	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Stena Line BV	1,260	567	+122%	338 of 408	114	253	−55%	DNV	C
2024	Stena Line BV	1,139	547	+108%	313 of 404	106	233	−55%	DNV	C
2023	not published	1,128	680	+66%	305 of 386	101	234	−57%	DNV	C
2022	not published	1,075	626	+72%	287 of 394	103	253	−59%	DNV	C
2021	not published	1,158	815	+42%	260 of 377	106	226	−53%	DNV	C
2020	not published	1,115	751	+49%	237 of 387	104	217	−52%	Lloyd's Register	C
2019	not published	625	569	+10%	213 of 394	69.1	223	−69%	Lloyd's Register	–
2018	not published	848	729	+16%	198 of 361	71.5	184	−61%	Lloyd's Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.