Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

STENA TRANSIT

IMO: 9469388
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Hoek Van Holland
Technical efficiency: EEXI 21.53 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Stena Line BV · part of Stena

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

145

Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (−6%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

1,138

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 815 (+40%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

103

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 226 (−54%)

Average speed

16.9 kn

Ro-pax median 16.2 kn (+4%)

Fuel per day at sea

58.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,685 t

CO₂ emitted

30,222 t

Distance sailed

66,873 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,955 h

165 days, 45% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 142 kg/nm · median 150 (−6%)

69.3Ranks 171 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 15.7 kn · median 15.8 (−1%)

12.0Faster than 49% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 1,251 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+121%)

66.8Ranks 337 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 113 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−55%)

48.6Ranks 105 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU55%
Into the EU43%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

762 t

2.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

STENA TRANSIT
Ro-pax median

140.0145.0150.0155.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

STENA TRANSIT
Ro-pax median

15.516.016.517.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

STENA TRANSIT
Ro-pax median

50.0100150200250300

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

STENA TRANSIT
Ro-pax median

0.05001,0001,500

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	+1%	−1%	−2%	+13%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.2 kn	−4%	−5%	+3%	+1%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	−2%	−4%	−3%	+0%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	+2%	+0%	+3%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	−5%	−3%	−0%	+8%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.3 kn	+2%	−0%	−3%	+70%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.2 kn	−2%	−0%	+3%	+203%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Stena Line BV	9,557	29,817	67,341	4,292	15.7	142	–	–
2024	Stena Line BV	9,611	29,982	68,667	4,256	16.1	140	–	–
2023	not published	9,697	30,251	66,495	4,090	16.3	146	–	–
2022	not published	10,197	31,800	68,822	4,150	16.6	148	–	–
2021	not published	9,685	30,222	66,873	3,955	16.9	145	–	–
2020	not published	10,219	32,283	67,132	4,046	16.6	152	–	–
2019	not published	10,371	32,377	69,208	4,098	16.9	150	–	–
2018	not published	10,232	31,938	67,260	4,024	16.7	152	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Stena Line BV	1,251	567	+121%	337 of 408	113	253	−55%	DNV	C
2024	Stena Line BV	1,109	547	+103%	311 of 404	102	233	−56%	DNV	C
2023	not published	1,101	680	+62%	298 of 386	97.9	234	−58%	DNV	C
2022	not published	1,096	626	+75%	291 of 394	105	253	−59%	DNV	C
2021	not published	1,138	815	+40%	255 of 377	103	226	−54%	DNV	C
2020	not published	1,057	751	+41%	229 of 387	97.6	217	−55%	Lloyd's Register	C
2019	not published	620	569	+9%	211 of 394	68.1	223	−69%	Lloyd's Register	–
2018	not published	205	729	−72%	97 of 361	90.3	184	−51%	Lloyd's Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.