Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM ALASKA

IMO: 9469572
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 103,038 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EIV 14.21 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 102,493 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

323

Container median 182 kg/nm (+78%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.82

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−51%)

Average speed

16.5 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+20%)

Fuel per day at sea

127.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

21,559 t

CO₂ emitted

67,147 t

Distance sailed

66,714 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,052 h

169 days, 46% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2019

Set against all 1,788 container ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 329 kg/nm · median 174 (+89%)

82.1Ranks 1,709 of 1,788, lowest first309

Average speedThis ship 15.4 kn · median 13.7 (+12%)

8.6Faster than 74% of container ships16.5

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.96 g CO₂/t·nm · median 18.9 (−47%)

7.86Ranks 316 of 1,788, lowest first55.3

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports19%
From the EU13%
Into the EU65%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,645 t

2.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM ALASKA
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM ALASKA
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM ALASKA
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2018→2019	−1.1 kn	+2%	−5%	−65%	+1%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2019	not published	7,648	23,830	23,220	1,506	15.4	329	9.96	–
2018	not published	21,559	67,147	66,714	4,052	16.5	323	9.82	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2019	not published	9.96	18.9	−47%	316 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	9.82	20.2	−51%	254 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.