Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

EUROCARGO CAGLIARI

IMO: 9471068
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 5,246 t
Port of registry: Palermo
Technical efficiency: EIV 10.74 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A · part of Grimaldi Group

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,246 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

128.4 kg/nm

Ro-ro median 104.6 kg/nm (+23%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

76.50

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 95.19 (−20%)

Average speed

16.3 kn

Ro-ro median 14.4 kn (+13%)

Fuel per day at sea

50.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,215 t

CO₂ emitted

28,805 t

29,257 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

71,781 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,408 h

184 days, 50% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 128.4 kg/nm · median 104.6 (+23%)

56.6Ranks 172 of 235, lowest first145.3

Average speedThis ship 16.3 kn · median 14.4 (+13%)

10.9Faster than 79% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 76.50 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.19 (−20%)

47.35Ranks 79 of 235, lowest first297.27

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports88%
From the EU0%
Into the EU1%
At berth in the EU11%

56% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (16,264 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

11.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.5 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

EUROCARGO CAGLIARI
Ro-ro median

100.0120.0140.0160.0180.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EUROCARGO CAGLIARI
Ro-ro median

14.016.018.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EUROCARGO CAGLIARI
Ro-ro median

60.080.0100120140

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+2.0 kn	−3%	+11%	+2%	−39%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.9 kn	−1%	−12%	−24%	+9%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.7 kn	−7%	−3%	+14%	+32%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.8 kn	−11%	−20%	−2%	−2%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.0 kn	+4%	−2%	−11%	+15%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.5 kn	+7%	+10%	+18%	+3%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.7 kn	+6%	+2%	−12%	+1%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	9,215	28,805	71,781	4,408	16.3	128.4	76.50	–
2024	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	9,312	29,071	70,553	4,931	14.3	132.0	125.55	–
2023	not published	12,313	38,429	92,818	5,747	16.2	132.7	115.22	–
2022	not published	11,589	36,173	81,114	5,230	15.5	142.9	87.17	–
2021	not published	13,312	41,552	82,972	4,804	17.3	160.4	88.55	–
2020	not published	14,343	44,749	92,957	5,075	18.3	154.3	77.03	–
2019	not published	11,323	35,340	78,595	4,421	17.8	144.1	75.07	–
2018	not published	12,094	37,752	88,851	4,811	18.5	136.1	74.24	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	76.50	95.19	−20%	79 of 235	RINA	A
2024	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	125.55	97.53	+29%	133 of 220	RINA	A
2023	not published	115.22	108.62	+6%	117 of 221	RINA	A
2022	not published	87.17	90.62	−4%	101 of 223	RINA	A
2021	not published	88.55	103.64	−15%	86 of 219	RINA	A
2020	not published	77.03	102.77	−25%	74 of 238	RINA	A
2019	not published	75.07	90.89	−17%	86 of 271	RINA	A
2018	not published	74.24	91.03	−18%	79 of 260	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.