Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

EUROCARGO CAGLIARI

IMO: 9471068
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 5,246 t
Flag (estimated): Italy
Port of registry: Palermo
Technical efficiency: EIV 10.74 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A · part of Grimaldi Group

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,250 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

154

Ro-ro median 109 kg/nm (+41%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

77.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 103 (−25%)

Average speed

18.3 kn

Ro-ro median 14.4 kn (+27%)

Fuel per day at sea

67.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,343 t

CO₂ emitted

44,749 t

Distance sailed

92,957 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,075 h

211 days, 58% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 128 kg/nm · median 105 (+23%)

56.6Ranks 172 of 235, lowest first145

Average speedThis ship 16.3 kn · median 14.4 (+13%)

10.9Faster than 79% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 76.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.2 (−20%)

47.4Ranks 79 of 235, lowest first297

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports94%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,537 t

5.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EUROCARGO CAGLIARI
Ro-ro median

100.0120.0140.0160.0180.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EUROCARGO CAGLIARI
Ro-ro median

14.016.018.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EUROCARGO CAGLIARI
Ro-ro median

60.080.0100120140

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+2.0 kn	−3%	+11%	+2%	−39%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.9 kn	−1%	−12%	−24%	+9%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.7 kn	−7%	−3%	+14%	+32%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.8 kn	−11%	−20%	−2%	−2%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.0 kn	+4%	−2%	−11%	+15%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.5 kn	+7%	+10%	+18%	+3%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.7 kn	+6%	+2%	−12%	+1%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	9,215	28,805	71,781	4,408	16.3	128	76.5	–
2024	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	9,312	29,071	70,553	4,931	14.3	132	126	–
2023	not published	12,313	38,429	92,818	5,747	16.2	133	115	–
2022	not published	11,589	36,173	81,114	5,230	15.5	143	87.2	–
2021	not published	13,312	41,552	82,972	4,804	17.3	160	88.6	–
2020	not published	14,343	44,749	92,957	5,075	18.3	154	77.0	–
2019	not published	11,323	35,340	78,595	4,421	17.8	144	75.1	–
2018	not published	12,094	37,752	88,851	4,811	18.5	136	74.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	76.5	95.2	−20%	79 of 235	RINA	A
2024	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	126	97.5	+29%	133 of 220	RINA	A
2023	not published	115	109	+6%	117 of 221	RINA	A
2022	not published	87.2	90.6	−4%	101 of 223	RINA	A
2021	not published	88.6	104	−15%	86 of 219	RINA	A
2020	not published	77.0	103	−25%	74 of 238	RINA	A
2019	not published	75.1	90.9	−17%	86 of 271	RINA	A
2018	not published	74.2	91.0	−18%	79 of 260	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.