Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

EUROCARGO LIVORNO

IMO: 9471070
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 3,848 t
Port of registry: Palermo
Technical efficiency: EIV 11.37 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A · part of Grimaldi Group

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,848 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

124.8 kg/nm

Ro-ro median 104.6 kg/nm (+19%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

101

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 95.19 (+6%)

Average speed

16.1 kn

Ro-ro median 14.4 kn (+12%)

Fuel per day at sea

48.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

8,203 t

CO₂ emitted

25,599 t

26,002 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

65,752 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,080 h

170 days, 47% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 124.8 kg/nm · median 104.6 (+19%)

56.6Ranks 167 of 235, lowest first145.3

Average speedThis ship 16.1 kn · median 14.4 (+12%)

10.9Faster than 78% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 101.17 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.19 (+6%)

47.35Ranks 123 of 235, lowest first297.27

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports89%
From the EU0%
Into the EU2%
At berth in the EU9%

35% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (9,038 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

9.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.4 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

EUROCARGO LIVORNO
Ro-ro median

100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EUROCARGO LIVORNO
Ro-ro median

14.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EUROCARGO LIVORNO
Ro-ro median

80.090.0100110120

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+1.6 kn	+3%	+15%	−26%	−12%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.9 kn	−12%	−22%	+10%	+4%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.6 kn	−5%	−9%	−16%	+15%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−2.0 kn	−2%	−12%	−1%	−7%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	+5%	+3%	+20%	+16%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.0 kn	+6%	+11%	−10%	+10%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.3 kn	+9%	−3%	−13%	−15%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	8,203	25,599	65,752	4,080	16.1	124.8	101.17	–
2024	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	10,822	33,771	89,354	6,177	14.5	121.1	114.84	–
2023	not published	11,210	35,000	81,394	4,952	16.4	137.7	110.45	–
2022	not published	14,090	43,950	96,814	5,680	17.0	145.5	95.78	–
2021	not published	14,537	45,355	98,269	5,184	19.0	147.9	102.70	–
2020	not published	11,535	35,996	82,171	4,237	19.4	140.4	88.78	–
2019	not published	12,101	37,747	91,387	4,954	18.4	132.4	80.40	–
2018	not published	12,800	39,938	105,138	5,076	20.7	121.8	94.93	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	101.17	95.19	+6%	123 of 235	RINA	A
2024	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	114.84	97.53	+18%	123 of 220	RINA	A
2023	not published	110.45	108.62	+2%	114 of 221	RINA	A
2022	not published	95.78	90.62	+6%	121 of 223	RINA	A
2021	not published	102.70	103.64	−1%	107 of 219	RINA	A
2020	not published	88.78	102.77	−14%	92 of 238	RINA	A
2019	not published	80.40	90.89	−12%	105 of 271	RINA	A
2018	not published	94.93	91.03	+4%	143 of 260	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.