Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

EUROCARGO LIVORNO

IMO: 9471070
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 3,848 t
Flag (estimated): Italy
Port of registry: Palermo
Technical efficiency: EIV 11.37 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A · part of Grimaldi Group

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,934 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

140

Ro-ro median 109 kg/nm (+28%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

88.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 103 (−14%)

Average speed

19.4 kn

Ro-ro median 14.4 kn (+35%)

Fuel per day at sea

65.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,535 t

CO₂ emitted

35,996 t

Distance sailed

82,171 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,237 h

177 days, 48% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 125 kg/nm · median 105 (+19%)

56.6Ranks 167 of 235, lowest first145

Average speedThis ship 16.1 kn · median 14.4 (+12%)

10.9Faster than 78% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 101 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.2 (+6%)

47.4Ranks 123 of 235, lowest first297

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports94%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,045 t

5.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EUROCARGO LIVORNO
Ro-ro median

100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EUROCARGO LIVORNO
Ro-ro median

14.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EUROCARGO LIVORNO
Ro-ro median

80.090.0100110120

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.6 kn	+3%	+15%	−26%	−12%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.9 kn	−12%	−22%	+10%	+4%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.6 kn	−5%	−9%	−16%	+15%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−2.0 kn	−2%	−12%	−1%	−7%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	+5%	+3%	+20%	+16%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.0 kn	+6%	+11%	−10%	+10%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.3 kn	+9%	−3%	−13%	−15%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	8,203	25,599	65,752	4,080	16.1	125	101	–
2024	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	10,822	33,771	89,354	6,177	14.5	121	115	–
2023	not published	11,210	35,000	81,394	4,952	16.4	138	110	–
2022	not published	14,090	43,950	96,814	5,680	17.0	146	95.8	–
2021	not published	14,537	45,355	98,269	5,184	19.0	148	103	–
2020	not published	11,535	35,996	82,171	4,237	19.4	140	88.8	–
2019	not published	12,101	37,747	91,387	4,954	18.4	132	80.4	–
2018	not published	12,800	39,938	105,138	5,076	20.7	122	94.9	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	101	95.2	+6%	123 of 235	RINA	A
2024	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	115	97.5	+18%	123 of 220	RINA	A
2023	not published	110	109	+2%	114 of 221	RINA	A
2022	not published	95.8	90.6	+6%	121 of 223	RINA	A
2021	not published	103	104	−1%	107 of 219	RINA	A
2020	not published	88.8	103	−14%	92 of 238	RINA	A
2019	not published	80.4	90.9	−12%	105 of 271	RINA	A
2018	not published	94.9	91.0	+4%	143 of 260	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.