Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM TARRAGONA

IMO: 9471214
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 33,736 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.90 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: ZIM TARRAGONA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM SA · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 28,941 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

171

Container median 172 kg/nm (−1%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

18.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (+5%)

Average speed

13.3 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

54.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,804 t

CO₂ emitted

36,853 t

Distance sailed

69,017 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,192 h

216 days, 59% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 167 kg/nm · median 177 (−6%)

78.8Ranks 1,040 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 8.7 kn · median 13.3 (−35%)

9.1Faster than 8% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−5%)

7.22Ranks 1,051 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports16%
From the EU50%
Into the EU32%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

910 t

2.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM TARRAGONA
Container median

140.0160.0180.0200.0220.0240.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM TARRAGONA
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM TARRAGONA
Container median

15.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−3.8 kn	+4%	−27%	−43%	+2%	3.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	−4%	−8%	+20%	−21%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−2.4 kn	−24%	−36%	−18%	−27%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 24%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.6 kn	+17%	+22%	−21%	+34%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.5 kn	+11%	+23%	−0%	+7%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	+10%	+10%	−1%	+16%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−1.9 kn	−3%	−15%	−5%	−6%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CMA CGM SA	5,088	16,025	30,566	3,502	8.7	167	15.5	94%
2024part-year	CMA CGM SA	616	1,942	5,026	433	11.6	123	11.0	92%
2024	CMA CGM SA	8,543	26,869	53,374	4,285	12.5	160	15.2	94%
2023	not published	7,475	23,502	44,622	3,446	13.0	168	19.3	92%
2022	not published	11,976	37,449	54,190	3,511	15.4	221	26.3	94%
2021	not published	13,018	40,799	68,757	4,646	14.8	189	19.7	–
2020	not published	11,804	36,853	69,017	5,192	13.3	171	18.5	–
2019	not published	10,834	33,813	69,388	5,219	13.3	156	15.9	–
2018	not published	11,762	36,693	72,829	4,806	15.2	162	16.9	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA CGM SA	15.5	16.3	−5%	1,051 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024part-year	CMA CGM SA	–	–	–	–	ABS	C
2024	CMA CGM SA	15.2	17.5	−13%	829 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	19.3	19.4	−1%	942 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	26.3	19.1	+38%	1,192 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	19.7	17.9	+10%	974 of 1,781	Verifavia	B
2020	not published	18.5	17.6	+5%	943 of 1,797	Verifavia	B
2019	not published	15.9	18.9	−16%	719 of 1,788	Verifavia	B
2018	not published	16.9	20.2	−16%	670 of 1,705	Verifavia	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.