Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

BODIL KNUTSEN

IMO: 9472529
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 42,717 t
Port of registry: Haugesund
Technical efficiency: EEXI 2.83 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: KNOT Management AS

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 42,717 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

247.1 kg/nm

Oil tanker median 128.5 kg/nm (+92%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

18.51

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (+133%)

Average speed

8.3 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (−22%)

Fuel per day at sea

49.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,673 t

CO₂ emitted

34,153 t

34,677 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

43,193 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,173 h

216 days, 59% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 247.1 kg/nm · median 128.5 (+92%)

76.1Ranks 1,623 of 1,665, lowest first190.8

Average speedThis ship 8.3 kn · median 10.7 (−22%)

8.0Faster than 12% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 18.51 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+133%)

4.51Ranks 1,364 of 1,665, lowest first27.66

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports26%
From the EU29%
Into the EU35%
At berth in the EU10%

68% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (23,157 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

9.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.5 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

BODIL KNUTSEN
Oil tanker median

100.0200.0300.0400.0500.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BODIL KNUTSEN
Oil tanker median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BODIL KNUTSEN
Oil tanker median

0.010.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+1.2 kn	−11%	+4%	+14%	−13%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.0 kn	−7%	−18%	+9%	−17%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.5 kn	−31%	−15%	+52%	−39%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 31%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.8 kn	+37%	+7%	+16%	+50%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 37%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−3.1 kn	+55%	+13%	+317%	+502%	3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 55%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+5.0 kn	−22%	+38%	−88%	−67%	5.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.3 kn	+6%	−12%	−24%	−10%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	KNOT Management AS	10,673	34,153	43,193	5,173	8.3	247.1	18.51	–
2024	KNOT Management AS	10,486	33,563	37,774	5,287	7.1	277.6	21.25	–
2023	not published	10,372	33,200	34,713	4,271	8.1	298.8	25.60	–
2022	not published	9,879	31,668	22,860	3,474	6.6	432.2	42.16	–
2021	not published	6,202	19,884	19,669	2,336	8.4	315.3	28.11	–
2020	not published	957	2,992	4,717	409	11.5	202.8	4.67	–
2019	not published	10,090	32,267	38,569	5,949	6.5	261.6	14.23	–
2018	not published	12,550	40,237	50,964	6,528	7.8	246.3	15.88	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	KNOT Management AS	18.51	7.95	+133%	1,364 of 1,665	DNV	A+C
2024	KNOT Management AS	21.25	8.06	+164%	1,546 of 1,787	Lloyd's Register	B+C
2023	not published	25.60	8.44	+203%	1,621 of 1,797	Lloyd's Register	A+B+C
2022	not published	42.16	8.51	+395%	1,886 of 1,961	Lloyd's Register	A+B+C
2021	not published	28.11	8.86	+217%	1,639 of 1,789	Lloyd's Register	B
2020	not published	4.67	9.03	−48%	174 of 1,870	Lloyd's Register	B
2019	not published	14.23	8.83	+61%	1,458 of 1,919	Lloyd's Register	–
2018	not published	15.88	8.86	+79%	1,425 of 1,779	Lloyd's Register	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.