Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

BODIL KNUTSEN

IMO: 9472529
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 42,717 t
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: Haugesund
Technical efficiency: EEXI 2.83 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: KNOT Management AS

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 49,718 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

246

Oil tanker median 140 kg/nm (+76%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.9

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.86 (+79%)

Average speed

7.8 kn

Oil tanker median 9.8 kn (−20%)

Fuel per day at sea

46.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,550 t

CO₂ emitted

40,237 t

Distance sailed

50,964 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,528 h

272 days, 75% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 247 kg/nm · median 129 (+92%)

76.1Ranks 1,623 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 8.3 kn · median 10.7 (−22%)

8.0Faster than 12% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 18.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+133%)

4.51Ranks 1,364 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports74%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU26%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

10,554 t

26.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BODIL KNUTSEN
Oil tanker median

100.0200.0300.0400.0500.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BODIL KNUTSEN
Oil tanker median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BODIL KNUTSEN
Oil tanker median

0.010.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.2 kn	−11%	+4%	+14%	−13%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.0 kn	−7%	−18%	+9%	−17%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.5 kn	−31%	−15%	+52%	−39%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 31%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.8 kn	+37%	+7%	+16%	+50%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 37%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−3.1 kn	+55%	+13%	+317%	+502%	3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 55%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+5.0 kn	−22%	+38%	−88%	−67%	5.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.3 kn	+6%	−12%	−24%	−10%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	KNOT Management AS	10,673	34,153	43,193	5,173	8.3	247	18.5	–
2024	KNOT Management AS	10,486	33,563	37,774	5,287	7.1	278	21.3	–
2023	not published	10,372	33,200	34,713	4,271	8.1	299	25.6	–
2022	not published	9,879	31,668	22,860	3,474	6.6	432	42.2	–
2021	not published	6,202	19,884	19,669	2,336	8.4	315	28.1	–
2020	not published	957	2,992	4,717	409	11.5	203	4.67	–
2019	not published	10,090	32,267	38,569	5,949	6.5	262	14.2	–
2018	not published	12,550	40,237	50,964	6,528	7.8	246	15.9	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	KNOT Management AS	18.5	7.95	+133%	1,364 of 1,665	DNV	A+C
2024	KNOT Management AS	21.3	8.06	+164%	1,546 of 1,787	Lloyd's Register	B+C
2023	not published	25.6	8.44	+203%	1,621 of 1,797	Lloyd's Register	A+B+C
2022	not published	42.2	8.51	+395%	1,886 of 1,961	Lloyd's Register	A+B+C
2021	not published	28.1	8.86	+217%	1,639 of 1,789	Lloyd's Register	B
2020	not published	4.67	9.03	−48%	174 of 1,870	Lloyd's Register	B
2019	not published	14.2	8.83	+61%	1,458 of 1,919	Lloyd's Register	–
2018	not published	15.9	8.86	+79%	1,425 of 1,779	Lloyd's Register	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.