Navalyze · Container · Ship

NORDIC ISTRIA

IMO: 9474383
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 4,845 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 21.17 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: ISTRIAN EXPRESS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Drevin Bereederungs-GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,608 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

141

Container median 182 kg/nm (−23%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

51.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+154%)

Average speed

11.8 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (−14%)

Fuel per day at sea

40.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

8,026 t

CO₂ emitted

25,251 t

Distance sailed

57,039 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,814 h

201 days, 55% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 61.8 kg/nm · median 177 (−65%)

78.8Ranks 42 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 10.3 kn · median 13.3 (−23%)

9.1Faster than 17% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 40.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+151%)

7.22Ranks 1,892 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports90%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU10%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,490 t

9.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NORDIC ISTRIA
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NORDIC ISTRIA
Container median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NORDIC ISTRIA
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.6 kn	−11%	−16%	+15%	−7%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−1.2 kn	−9%	−18%	−9%	+4%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−5%	−5%	−14%	+1%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	−9%	−10%	−12%	−23%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.0 kn	−25%	−31%	+121%	−40%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+6.2 kn	+22%	+125%	−21%	+133%	6.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−4.6 kn	−32%	−58%	−32%	−26%	4.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 32%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Drevin Bereederungs-GmbH & Co. KG	3,322	10,652	53,793	5,224	10.3	61.8	40.9	100%
2024	Drevin Bereederungs-GmbH & Co. KG	3,262	10,456	46,779	4,282	10.9	69.7	43.9	–
2023	not published	3,934	12,413	51,458	4,250	12.1	76.5	42.2	–
2022	not published	4,807	15,170	59,958	4,922	12.2	80.2	41.6	88%
2021	not published	6,008	18,790	68,211	5,523	12.4	88.1	53.8	95%
2020	not published	3,618	11,434	30,864	2,307	13.4	117	89.1	–
2019	not published	3,746	11,770	38,888	5,378	7.2	96.3	38.2	–
2018	not published	8,026	25,251	57,039	4,814	11.8	141	51.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Drevin Bereederungs-GmbH & Co. KG	40.9	16.3	+151%	1,892 of 2,208	RINA	A
2024	Drevin Bereederungs-GmbH & Co. KG	43.9	17.5	+150%	1,670 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	42.2	19.4	+117%	1,569 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	41.6	19.1	+118%	1,504 of 1,825	ABS	B
2021	not published	53.8	17.9	+201%	1,637 of 1,781	ABS	B
2020	not published	89.1	17.6	+407%	1,790 of 1,797	ABS	B
2019	not published	38.2	18.9	+102%	1,389 of 1,788	RINA	B
2018	not published	51.4	20.2	+154%	1,502 of 1,705	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.