Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

KORCULA

IMO
9476305
Type
Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated)
Croatia
Port of registry
Rijeka
Technical efficiency
EEXI 58.20 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Jadrolinija Rijeka

?
?

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
65.7
Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (−58%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
1.36
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 569 (−100%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
1.38
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 223 (−99%)
Average speed
13.5 kn
Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−15%)
Fuel per day at sea
21.2 t/day
Fuel consumed
2,257 t
CO₂ emitted
7,235 t
Distance sailed
34,337 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,552 h
106 days, 29% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 72.0 kg/nm · median 150 (−52%)
69.3Ranks 49 of 408, lowest first232
Average speedThis ship 13.0 kn · median 15.8 (−18%)
12.0Faster than 16% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 58.3 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−90%)
66.8Ranks 31 of 408, lowest first1,569
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 439 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+73%)
48.6Ranks 263 of 408, lowest first1,247
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports80%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU20%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
1,447 t
20.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • KORCULA
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • KORCULA
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • KORCULA
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • KORCULA
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+1.2 kn+2%+13%+23%–1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−1.1 kn+4%−4%−42%–1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023−0.4 kn+2%−1%+12%–0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022−0.3 kn+1%−2%−9%−90%Same speed, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+0.5 kn−0%+4%−8%−3%0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020−0.4 kn−0%−3%+39%−1%0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019−1.2 kn+1%−7%−24%+12%1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025Jadrolinija Rijeka2,2807,30931,6422,43213.072.0––
2024Jadrolinija1,8115,80825,7362,18411.870.4––
2023not published3,0109,65044,6183,46912.967.5––
2022not published2,6228,40639,8102,99713.365.9––
2021not published2,8679,19043,8703,22013.665.3––
2020not published3,12610,02247,7783,64913.165.4––
2019not published2,2577,23534,3372,55213.565.7––
2018not published2,9269,38245,0973,07714.764.9––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025Jadrolinija Rijeka58.3567−90%31 of 408439253+73%VerifaviaB
2024Jadrolinija–––––––VerifaviaB
2023not published–––––––VerifaviaB
2022not published0.13626−100%3 of 3941.27253−99%VerifaviaB
2021not published1.30815−100%1 of 3771.04226−100%CROATIAN REGISTER OF SHIPPINGB
2020not published1.34751−100%13 of 3871.02217−100%CROATIAN REGISTER OF SHIPPINGB
2019not published1.36569−100%12 of 3941.38223−99%CROATIAN REGISTER OF SHIPPINGB
2018not published1.21729−100%10 of 3611.23184−99%CROATIAN REGISTER OF SHIPPINGB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.