Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

AUGUSTA LUNA

IMO: 9480124
Type: General cargo ship
Average cargo carried: 5,278 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EIV 15.99 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: LOLLAND

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MS "Lolland" Schifffahrt GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

62.5

General cargo median 55.9 kg/nm (+12%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

16.7

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 22.7 (−27%)

Average speed

13.1 kn

General cargo median 10.9 kn (+20%)

Fuel per day at sea

19.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,401 t

CO₂ emitted

10,753 t

Distance sailed

54,413 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,169 h

174 days, 48% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 72.0 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+105%)

17.4Ranks 2,320 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 12.4 kn · median 9.3 (+33%)

6.9Faster than 93% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 35.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (+38%)

10.2Ranks 2,042 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU56%
Into the EU35%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

320 t

3.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AUGUSTA LUNA
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.070.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AUGUSTA LUNA
General cargo median

9.010.011.012.013.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

AUGUSTA LUNA
General cargo median

10.020.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+4%	+3%	+18%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	−6%	−8%	−8%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	+16%	+13%	+5%	+5%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	+2%	+2%	+11%	+7%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	+0.6 kn	−17%	−13%	+6%	−17%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+2.9 kn	+7%	+39%	+392%	−21%	2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.4 kn	+16%	−7%	−20%	−52%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MS "Lolland" Schifffahrt GmbH & Co. KG	4,942	15,461	68,692	5,538	12.4	72.0	42.6	–
2024	Lubeca Marine Germany GmbH	4,046	12,668	58,322	4,687	12.4	69.4	37.3	–
2023	not published	4,676	14,773	63,336	5,000	12.7	73.8	–	–
2022	not published	3,849	12,160	60,487	4,650	13.0	63.6	–	–
2021	not published	3,401	10,753	54,413	4,169	13.1	62.5	–	–
2020	not published	3,855	12,184	51,364	4,113	12.5	75.0	–	–
2019	not published	735	2,311	10,450	1,092	9.6	70.4	–	–
2018	not published	797	2,499	13,126	1,098	12.0	60.7	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MS "Lolland" Schifffahrt GmbH & Co. KG	35.2	25.5	+38%	2,042 of 2,723	EnvService	B
2024	Lubeca Marine Germany GmbH	–	–	–	–	EnvService	A
2023	not published	18.7	20.7	−10%	441 of 1,045	EnvService	A
2022	not published	17.8	21.6	−18%	345 of 1,034	Bureau Veritas	A
2021	not published	16.7	22.7	−27%	279 of 1,142	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	20.1	24.5	−18%	368 of 1,167	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	25.3	25.0	+1%	589 of 1,154	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	53.2	24.9	+114%	924 of 1,044	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.